Profile image

[WIP-2] C-130A Hercules

52.6k NewWorldAerospace  3 months ago
Auto Credit Based on NewWorldAerospace's [WIP] C-130A Hercules

Le Herc

Got Its Tail Fuselage With Its Stabilizers Wings/Tailplane And Radome Done And Completed,
(But) Still Beefing With Its Wings And Engines

T For Tag

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor [WIP] C-130A Hercules
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 50.8ft (15.5m)
  • Length 97.0ft (29.6m)
  • Height 37.5ft (11.4m)
  • Empty Weight 71,201lbs (32,296kg)
  • Loaded Weight 78,734lbs (35,713kg)

Performance

  • Wing Loading 57.2lbs/ft2 (279.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1,377.2ft2 (127.9m2)
  • Drag Points 15783

Parts

  • Number of Parts 88
  • Control Surfaces 9
  • Performance Cost 599
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    27.9k 126

    t

    Pinned 3 months ago
  • Profile image

    Also

    T

    Pinned 3 months ago
  • Profile image

    Quote Of Today :

    "It Is Pointless If An Aircraft Got Very Low Part Count But Got Performance Cost So High"

    ~ Fadel FDL / New World Aerospace

    Pinned 3 months ago
  • Profile image

    @C47skytrain Yes It Is ! It Will Be Low Part, Both Part And Performance Efficient !

    Pinned 3 months ago
  • Profile image
    57.6k TheMouse

    T

    Pinned 3 months ago
  • Profile image

    @DatFiat126Fan19 Check My Account, Its Already Out !

    3 months ago
  • Profile image

    Oooh. I'm also doing a C130, but its the J variant. Probably gonna do A C130T variant with SABIR(same as the Philippine air force C130T)

    +1 3 months ago
  • Profile image
    645 MACCOD

    Ooh functional landing gear bays nice

    +1 3 months ago
  • Profile image

    @ShinyGemsBro Oka Sir, Also Apologize/Pardon

    +1 3 months ago
  • Profile image
    42.9k ShinyGemsBro

    Don't tag me next time
    I can see your posts. I don't follow alot of people.

    +1 3 months ago
  • Profile image

    @C47skytrain But Tbh I Kinda Don't Give A F*ck (Don't {Really} Care) About Part Count, Because I Mainly Focussing On Performance Cost (I Tried To Keep It Bellow 1000 So Its Gonna Be So Mobile Friendly)
    ~
    It Is Pointless If An Aircraft Got Very Low Part Count But Got Performance Cost So High (And Lot Of PEA Aircrafts Got This Problem)

    3 months ago
  • Profile image

    @C47skytrain Here Is A Good News For You : The Older Version Got 112 Parts Only (For The 130A Variants) And The Updated One (Soon) Will Retain That Part Count !
    ~

    And It Can Be Just 100 Parts If You Removed Some Small Details ! (Aerials And Antenas)

    +1 3 months ago
  • Profile image
    1,875 C47skytrain

    Hmm, 88 parts when it isn't even completed doesn't feel low part. As long as it is 100 part or below, I'm happy :)

    +1 3 months ago
  • Profile image
    1,875 C47skytrain

    Could you make a low part version please?

    +1 3 months ago
  • Profile image

    Honorable Mention : @ReinMcDeer

    3 months ago
  • Profile image

    Honorable Mentions : @Angelcod73 , @Bryan5

    3 months ago
  • Profile image

    Honorable Mentions : @Monarchii , @MAPA , @WHNineTripleOne

    3 months ago