No Tags
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 42.1ft (12.8m)
- Length 45.4ft (13.8m)
- Height 8.9ft (2.7m)
- Empty Weight 26,789lbs (12,151kg)
- Loaded Weight 33,081lbs (15,005kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 2.377
- Wing Loading 81.2lbs/ft2 (396.3kg/m2)
- Wing Area 407.6ft2 (37.9m2)
- Drag Points 3999
Parts
- Number of Parts 122
- Control Surfaces 8
- Performance Cost 911
@CrestelAeronautics Honestly I say fourth, mostly because they're less expensive. Think of it; The F-22 is obviously a better fighter than the F-16, but the F-22 has limited numbers and high maintenance. Meanwhile the F-16 has high numbers and climbing.
@CrestelAeronautics 5th, but I do still choose based on looks
@TheUltimatePlaneLover k
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
OK, now riddle me this:
What’s better, a 4th gen. Fighter or a 5th gen. Fighter?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 It's already done, I'ma tag you now
@TheUltimatePlaneLover also before you upload it, upload it as unlisted and ping me
@CrestelAeronautics I will admit that is was my bad, I should have had everyone build a example, but I still don’t really like it
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 @CrestelAeronautics
Mind if I dip in?
-The Int.II is pretty much finished
-I'm still making the Trident, but Intimidator II will probably be useful
-Oh no! War! Wait. WAR!!
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
Also the design of the A-40 isn’t unreasonable, it’s just the obsene amount of weapons TUPL slapped onto that thing. Plus it’s a superplane, so, uhh, yes.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
This is why the Crestan Conflict started
@CrestelAeronautics his second one looked like it, that was the one I turned down, I do agree the original was ugly, but when I looked at the blueprint, I imagined something else, and reason doesn’t matter, the A-40 exists
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
Oh, not this, @TheUltimatePlaneLover ‘s design looks like the XR-45. Well, one of them. Also, the design may be somewhat different from the original blueprint. I thought the original design was:
1. Too unreasonable
2. Looked kind of ugly
@CrestelAeronautics what does the XR-45 have to do with it
@CrestelAeronautics it doesn’t look like it
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
Plus, this is the drawing, I just removed the TVC and modified the canards. Oh, and, it’ll be even closer to the drawing in an improved / experimental version
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
Stealth fighter Vs 4th gen XR-45
I DO NOT APPROVE OF THIS DESIGN, I LIKED THE DRAWING BEST, SO SINCE THIS IS GOING TO BE THE FINAL VERSION, @THEULTIMATEPLANELOVER INTIMIDATOR II IS GOING TO BE THE STANDARD FIGHTER
HOL UP WHEN DID I APPROVE THIS