(potato) Lamborghini Gallardo 2005
49.3k dussts
3 months ago
worst Gallardo in the website probably
Specifications
Spotlights
- TatsuTheOtaku 3 months ago
- Rjenteissussy 3 months ago
- KSB24 3 months ago
General Characteristics
- Successors 5 airplane(s) +197 bonus
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 7.2ft (2.2m)
- Length 14.1ft (4.3m)
- Height 3.9ft (1.2m)
- Empty Weight 2,267lbs (1,028kg)
- Loaded Weight 3,304lbs (1,498kg)
Performance
- Wing Loading N/A
- Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
- Drag Points 987
Parts
- Number of Parts 88
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 298
@dussts yeah, thanks!
@dussts nvm its boring
Time to make this LaMbArgAMbER drag modded
@MAHADI looks same lol, yours nice too
Finally, another European Supercar
@LunarEclipseSP E-Lambargambar
aiyo bro you made the same "Box-Lambo" like me lmao
@dussts what server is that
@JuliaAircraft hi Juliecraft from Foxzie server (?)
bro started a war with a single car ☠️
@GeneralCorpInc they're not insulting you, they're saying facts too about how you saying that other people are unfair and all of that in a forum post aren't going to help you or anyone whatsoever and how making that very argument will get you nowhere
@dussts that's what i was saying too
@126 yea. I'm only getting insulted for saying facts anyways. (2 times more downloads too... ☠)
@GeneralCorpInc nah I think my older builds are just basic
@GeneralCorpInc okay, also, can we please just end this already?
@126 his older builds were more detailed that's just the point, simple
bruh
@GeneralCorpInc i did but i found no difference between his older posts and his newer one
@126 see his older posts when hewas doing planes. I do try to ignore this fact but it comes very often. just, see the number of upvotes this got in less half day.
@GeneralCorpInc okay, then why not just ignore them then, plus, why does points matter to you so much? this community is supposed to be having fun, not constantly worry about how much useless internet points you had, also, wdym by "more complete vehicles"? since when did dussts ever make anything complex?
@126 well... just for instance, before, he was doing more complete vehicles yet still simple. It didn't worked well. Then he reduced details (and then work time) and that worked better. So he still make these as it visibly works very well.
I'm not saying he must not do. But at least he should train and learns to make real work on simple planes. I'm, even tho, respecting the fact he's able to do cars like that realistic, but without much efforts. But it's insulting for thoses who make actual effort and get almost nothing (not me, but new players that got talent or are very skilled. I'm a noob next to lots of them). But it's especially those who upvotes that are in fault in fact: they promote easy work above hard ones sometimes. It's not about the user, it's about the skill he got, we need to see that. Not just: "it's funny/cute/simple, upvote" it should be "He knew what he did / deep work / enough detailed, upvote" that's all i'm saying. I understand it hurts some like those who makes those simple and fast builds, but it's ain't better than those who make points farm. (Btw, most of them aren't getting much reconnaissance even if it's well made, except for the spam of posts)
yet another great potato car
@dussts please make fiat @126
@GeneralCorpInc explain me in great detail HOW this build which clearly had effort being put into it count as "point farms"? there's a reason as to why people upvoted these low part count builds if done right, and that is because of a thing called "part efficiency" and plus, these builds are NOTHING compared to actual upvote farms like spamming the same crap over and over and over again, dussts and monarchii atleast didn't reuse the same stuff over and over again
@SPTNR true, and the afformention 1988 honda civic dx hatchback