Profile image

GV-3 "Bundle"

41.3k Graingy  1.4 years ago
129 downloads

It's back!


After the positive but criticized reception of Graingy's previous Interceptor, the FU-2 "Fagot" Tactical Disrespect Fighter, specifically the sanctions put in place by the international SilverWolf trade committee, Graingy agreed to rework the fighter into something more palatable to the general public.
Also taking the opportunity to improve upon and rework the aircraft, the GV-3 "Bundle" was born.
Essentially a slightly upgraded FU-2, the aircraft fills the same role as before.


Big sh*tpost. Still.
lol
Still looks like it's made of shiny pastic like an indoor playground or something else (terminal brainrot).
I still want to put it in my mouth.
Mmmm... small plastic parts....
OH! Right, ahem, anyways, we at Graingy hope this vehicle is sufficiently effective for your enemy deleting needs!


(PS: MrSilverWolf, should you see this, I received no further specification on "some other things" beyond the obvious. I changed the obvious, but if I somehow missed something (which never existed. The obvious things were the only jokes present), let me CHANGE things before just deleting this craft again. I respect you greatly, probably more than I should for someone who basically babysits a bunch of plane nerds in their free time, and I mean no hostility with this message, but I just want to state that I would like any further perceived infractions to be pointed out peacefully. Thank you for letting me reupload, and have a nice day.)

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Created On Mac
  • Wingspan 40.1ft (12.2m)
  • Length 47.8ft (14.6m)
  • Height 20.1ft (6.1m)
  • Empty Weight 21,822lbs (9,898kg)
  • Loaded Weight 33,727lbs (15,298kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.998
  • Wing Loading 83.0lbs/ft2 (405.2kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 406.3ft2 (37.8m2)
  • Drag Points 4634

Parts

  • Number of Parts 116
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 773
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    41.3k Graingy

    Model seen here is the A version. The B had afterburning engines installed.

    Pinned 11 months ago
  • Profile image
    41.3k Graingy

    Dated 2023.
    New, but technologically simple.

    Pinned 1.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    41.3k Graingy

    Majakalona reuploaded FU-2

    Pinned 1.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy Exactly

    20 days ago
  • Profile image
    41.3k Graingy

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover That is a meaningless figure.

    20 days ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy I've been storing over a hundred yearsworth of money in pocket dimensions :D

    20 days ago
  • Profile image
    41.3k Graingy

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover You make terrible financial decisions.
    Tu n'as pas raison.

    20 days ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy Thx bro

    20 days ago
  • Profile image
    41.3k Graingy

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover I see...
    Well, in that case, 50 GV-3As, 50 GV-3Bs, at $150 million per unit for the As, $160 million per unit for the Bs. Ready by 15/3/25.
    Your funeral.

    +1 21 days ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy The As will be easier to modify

    21 days ago
  • Profile image
    41.3k Graingy

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover The B has an afterburner and costs a bit more. I'm not sure why you'd want the A, unless you lacked the maintenance capacity to handle Bs.

    21 days ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy How about both?
    50% As and 50% Bs

    21 days ago
  • Profile image
    41.3k Graingy

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Okay. This order is absurd but who am I to turn down money for the company?
    Do you want the A or B model?

    21 days ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy Yea

    21 days ago
  • Profile image
    41.3k Graingy

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Not for commercial sale, right?

    21 days ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy I can modify them if need be
    TUPL is an insane company for whatever reason

    21 days ago
  • Profile image
    41.3k Graingy

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover You want to pay $150 million for a low cost interceptor?
    With all due respect, you'd be better off sourcing from a variety of suppliers with those funds. While as a salesman I should accept, I cannot in good nature recommend that purchase. You're not buying a superior product, you're buying a rapid timetable.
    At the very least I'd suggest buying a multitude of our products, particularly things already in stock. Putting together 200 jets in under a week is no small feat.

    21 days ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy Maximum

    21 days ago
  • Profile image
    41.3k Graingy

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover you didn’t say what option.

    21 days ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy I'm buying it

    22 days ago
  • Profile image
    41.3k Graingy

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover yes to what?

    22 days ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy Yes

    23 days ago
  • Profile image
    41.3k Graingy

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Within that time frame "full stock" could be dozens (24), if you're fine doubling your unit price.
    Theoretically, at ten times base price, we could build you hundreds (Say, 200) by the 15th. Somehow, though, I doubt you'd want to pay $150 million for a low-cost interceptor.

    23 days ago
  • Profile image

    @Graingy My budget is large enough to contest JM
    I'll take your whole stock

    23 days ago
  • Profile image
    41.3k Graingy

    @TheUltimatePlaneLover Oh, in that case... how big is your budget? With enough incentive we could absolutely punch it with the production lines, but that'd massively increase the price tag. Under normal circumstances it's about $15 million per unit. That's for the A model, mind. The B model, which has afterburners installed (removed on the A for complexity and price) costs a bit more.

    23 days ago
  • Log in to see more comments