Auto Credit Based on MAHADI's WWI Challenge [CLOSED]
Lorraine Estoc Mk. I
Fielded by the Armée de l'Air from August 1916 through December 1917, the Lorraine Estoc served admirably as a front-line fighter. Despite it's large size and weight, the Estoc had excellent handling characteristics and proved quite popular with pilots, especially among the American volunteers. However, it's short range and high production cost meant that relatively few were built. Although retained as a trainer until 1920, most were mothballed in the post-war draw-down, with the final examples scrapped in 1926.
EDIT: Wing fixed
Specifications
Spotlights
- Hedero 3.1 years ago
- Tang0five 3.1 years ago
- AWESOMENESS360 3.1 years ago
- HR 3.1 years ago
- CookingWithCinderBlocks 2.9 years ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor WWI Challenge [CLOSED]
- Successors 1 airplane(s)
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 36.4ft (11.1m)
- Length 42.3ft (12.9m)
- Height 12.9ft (3.9m)
- Empty Weight 2,656lbs (1,204kg)
- Loaded Weight 3,632lbs (1,647kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 0.006
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.068
- Wing Loading 8.7lbs/ft2 (42.7kg/m2)
- Wing Area 415.8ft2 (38.6m2)
- Drag Points 3748
Parts
- Number of Parts 934
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 3,400
@Urocyon
rip
also i actually woke up someone that hasnt been here in almost a year thats crazy
@phrongus Haven't played in a while, had to uninstall due to lack of drive space. Will probably pick it up again eventually...
@Urocyon
are you dead
@Urocyon np!
@MAHADI Thanks!
I totally agree with you! @MAHADI
@Hedero I agree. this guy makes some really sick planes yet very phew people notice them.
a bit more lift would have made it better
RATING
Looks : 9.15/10 pts.
Performance : 9/10 pts.
Details : 9.35/10 pts.
Weaponry : 9.25/10 pts.
Bonus : 9.25/10 (Attention to details)
OVERALL RATING : 9.2/10
@Urocyon your welcome and i have had so much fun uhhhh shooting planes out of the sky
@Urocyon Thanks.
@JuanShot2Go I must say I love your profile avatar.
Agreed @JuanShot2Go
@Hedero Its the algorythm. I think its based on a social network rating systems, the number of friends and friends of friends. i think you have the right attitude. Build for the love of it. And the fewer but more appreciative people that enjoy what you create.
Yeah, the website makes zero sense. Sometimes a crap build with an ok cockpit receives a ton of support while really impressive builds like this one don’t get much. I’ve come to realize that I don’t build for points anymore, I’m predicting that I’ll get no more then 30 or 40 upvotes on my next upload. But that’s fine with me, I upload for entertainment for those who actually care about it. @Urocyon
@Hedero Thanks, it's certainly been one of my more intensive builds. I equate the low response to not being around for nearly a year...
Holy cow, this is absolutely insane! Bro I cant believe it received so little support!
@Levi124 Thanks!
welcome back!
owo
Wow. Nice
@Type2volkswagen
Thanks!
This plane is well built i have to say:)
Nice to see you back at it....
@Dathcha Heh, costs too much!
Did the engineers just give up building the tail fuselage halfway through?