AKA THE ”WE ARE SO BACK” JET
There’s no proof that the actual airframe will look like this; THIS IS CONSTRUCTED PURELY OUT OF SPECULATION!!!
I also made the weapon bays but no hinge or weapons inside.
ARMED VERSION: >>>Here<<<
Specifications
Spotlights
- xYoshii_ 21 days ago
- SuperSuperTheSylph 21 days ago
- NewWorldAerospace 21 days ago
- DJRianGamerTheHololiveFan 21 days ago
- UnitedinOne90XCVBNKA 21 days ago
- JBPAviation 21 days ago
- Rob119 20 days ago
- PannerTerkins 21 days ago
- M109simp 20 days ago
- dabestsock 9 days ago
- IAmSteve 21 days ago
- Convex 21 days ago
General Characteristics
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 45.9ft (14.0m)
- Length 62.3ft (19.0m)
- Height 9.9ft (3.0m)
- Empty Weight N/A
- Loaded Weight 39,194lbs (17,778kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 5.16
- Wing Loading 32.9lbs/ft2 (160.6kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,191.8ft2 (110.7m2)
- Drag Points 3104
Parts
- Number of Parts 60
- Control Surfaces 4
- Performance Cost 469
@AirNK lol
@deaner broooo🥲
I’d admit it doesn’t look pleasant though.
"spits on desk cause ugly"
Ace Combat irl💀
@Rob119 Thank you! I’d say I did have the X36 in mind when building this :)
Despite some views apparent below on this jet. I think you did a great job. Especially with a limited understanding.
Although you could have used some of the blueprints NASA made oh so many years ago. I'm assuming you did in some regard so there's that. Not sure why people are arguing over a jet that's 30 years old smh.
@AirNK I don’t like to argue and I said to just drop it but some people just like the beef I guess
@AirNK that’s what I said man
@Graingy ok man just drop it it’s not that serious
@AirNK The ball is in their court.
@Graingy @Erionh how about we all stop and part ways? If this continues I might have to remove some comments I’m sorry
@Erionh It's never wrong to hate fascism.
And with this comment I was no longer talking about politics. You immediately brought it back up afterwards.
@Graingy ok pal you were in the wrong let’s just agree to disagree this is getting annoying
@Erionh They hadn't been for a while, until you brought it back my mentioning it.
@AWESOMENESS360 I know right but that can’t stop me from building it :) I think I should add “out of speculation” in the description though thank you for reminding!
C'mon guys we don't even know what the back half of it looks like yet, we only know it has canards up front. It could look completely different from this.
@Graingy politics have indeed been mentioned
@Erionh politics haven’t been mentioned in a while.
By that same argument you could say that laptop computers were created for schools because schools use them. I doubt they were. Just because something is used in a context does not mean it was made for that context. This isn’t difficult to comprehend.
@Graingy so why is it used in over 300 schools and free for some districts and before this argument gets heated still politics should not be on this website
@Erionh being all ages (in terms of content warning) does not make something a children’s game.
And so far as I am aware it was not made for schools, Jundroo just figured it could work as such.
@Graingy what non appropriate things are in this game its literally made for schools to use
@AirNK fine
Ik these parts are kinda too large to be called “tips” lol I just wanted to try and minimize part count so didn’t bother to split them to smaller parts…
@AirNK The fully moving wingtip was originally a solution for tailless aircraft, but I have never seen the use like you before.
@JSTQ Yeah I took the moving wingtip idea from the Chinese 6gens, I built both of them earlier