De Havilland Mosquito
De Haviland de Havilland mosquito mosquito, referred to as the bomber, is composed of a wooden light bomber de Haviland company design and manufacture, is regarded as the innovation of British aviation history of the Second World War, is also one of the few wooden military aircraft, with "wood miracle" reputation, its low weight, shenqingruyan moreover, excellent performance, low price, raw material saving, outstanding models quickly became a distinctive, by a large number of production and modification. During the Second World War, the mosquito bomber created the best record of the combat effectiveness of the Royal Air Force bomber. Mosquito aircraft is the pride of the British, but also full of legendary generation name machine.
Specifications
Spotlights
- Deal8late8no8more 7.7 years ago
- ChiChiWerx 7.7 years ago
- A3 7.7 years ago
- TAplanes 7.7 years ago
- NativeChief1492 7.7 years ago
- SteveMoneyMan 7.6 years ago
General Characteristics
- Successors 1 airplane(s) +7 bonus
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 55.0ft (16.7m)
- Length 45.3ft (13.8m)
- Height 16.9ft (5.1m)
- Empty Weight 11,776lbs (5,341kg)
- Loaded Weight 12,735lbs (5,776kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.157
- Wing Loading 7.9lbs/ft2 (38.4kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,618.5ft2 (150.4m2)
- Drag Points 8305
Parts
- Number of Parts 221
- Control Surfaces 10
- Performance Cost 883
I think they called it the wooden wonder
I really like this, great work, Shipster approves. But there is one flaw that kinda bugs me, the real Mosquito had two people side-by-side. Great work anyway!
Very nice work, it is very obvious a lot of work went into this plane, I'm going to say probably the best Mosquito I've seen. Congratulations and keep up the excellent work.
Very nice work, do not put too much stock in the criticisms below, this is an excellent effort. Also, I appreciate that you took the time to post a description, even if you used Google translate, it is much better to have a description than not.
@BogdanX Thank you for reminding me. I will improve next time:)
@AdrianFlyingAce Sorry, my English is poor