Profile image

Fokker Dr.I

5,434 CDRxavier  4.5 years ago

The Long Awaited Backup

These rubbish planes see themselves being constructed out of parts not designed for such aircraft: wet wings, metallic wings, sheet frame coverings ...
An attempt so they never went to the sky. Properly. Until ... until their stats got tweaked.
They are still rubbish planes, but at least they are now acceptable low-speed aircrafts. Equipped with standard rotary gun, too.
Fokker D V
Fokker E III
Fokker E V


Addressed paint-asymmetry issue. Slightly improved nose-heavy issue:
Fokker Dr I Improved

General Characteristics

  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 26.8ft (8.2m)
  • Length 19.6ft (6.0m)
  • Height 9.4ft (2.9m)
  • Empty Weight 2,822lbs (1,280kg)
  • Loaded Weight 2,931lbs (1,329kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.042
  • Wing Loading 6.6lbs/ft2 (32.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 446.2ft2 (41.5m2)
  • Drag Points 2700

Parts

  • Number of Parts 64
  • Control Surfaces 8
  • Performance Cost 345
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    5,434 CDRxavier

    I can't believe how people wouldn't like the classic tri decker, even if it is weak and flies extremely slowly

    4.0 years ago