WiKi Link
Pros:
- Accurate build
- realistic MAIN landing gear
- Wing flex
- Refuel-able
- Low part
Cons:
- No Cockpit
- No openable doors
- Too much wing flex
- No slats
- Boeing or McDonnell Douglas?
- e
AGs:
AG-1 - Lights
AG-2 - Formation Lights
AG-3 - Reverse Thrust
Specifications
Spotlights
- DeathStalker627 2.0 years ago
- ShinyGemsBro 2.0 years ago
- Defalt1 2.0 years ago
- Sakorsky 2.0 years ago
- TheCommentaryGuy 2.0 years ago
- sKyCoS 2.0 years ago
- Marulk one year ago
- Gabriel747 one year ago
General Characteristics
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 212.4ft (64.7m)
- Length 222.8ft (67.9m)
- Height 72.8ft (22.2m)
- Empty Weight 72,929lbs (33,080kg)
- Loaded Weight 140,586lbs (63,769kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 3.644
- Wing Loading 18.7lbs/ft2 (91.5kg/m2)
- Wing Area 7,500.5ft2 (696.8m2)
- Drag Points 148688
Parts
- Number of Parts 684
- Control Surfaces 5
- Performance Cost 3,097
Very good
Good 10/10
@Defalt1 You were featured in one of my landing challenge videos. Isn't it?
@VinFage Hmmm?
@Defalt1 hmm I remember you
the ming flex makes it look ike a wannabe bird
Bro I love this.
Before McDonnel Douglas now is Boeing
The best low part with accurate shape C-17 on this site
@teddyone02 nice questions
No Cockpit(cuz I don’t get paid enough to do it)
No openable doors
Too much wing fle-
wait. you get paid?
Boing C-17 Worldlord the third
@Khanhlam 😳
No Cockpit(cuz I don’t get paid enough to do it).
Finally a c-17
@AlbertanPlaneMaker
Oh...?
I like the sound of This.
@AlbertanPlaneMaker
Oooh? Can you tell me? Or is it.. A Surprise!
@AlbertanPlaneMaker
How's the Crash Physics Plane going...?