Profile image

A-34 catback

37.1k Hahahahaahahshs  2.0 years ago
144 downloads
No Tags
Auto Credit Based on McChezborger's 1930s challenge (ClOSED)

Ok I can’t talk that much but after this I’m going to school and I should be back by 2:30 anyways this McChezborger 1930s challenge

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor 1930s challenge (ClOSED)
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 38.7ft (11.8m)
  • Length 30.7ft (9.4m)
  • Height 10.2ft (3.1m)
  • Empty Weight 8,071lbs (3,661kg)
  • Loaded Weight 10,298lbs (4,671kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.242
  • Wing Loading 41.6lbs/ft2 (203.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 247.6ft2 (23.0m2)
  • Drag Points 5578

Parts

  • Number of Parts 220
  • Control Surfaces 5
  • Performance Cost 863
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    5,303 McChezborger

    @Hahahahaahahshs
    One tip is to put extra wing parts to enhance performance, so, and to essentially hide them in the wing detail.

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @McChezborger I’m starting to think of a su-57 maneuvers as a biplane

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,303 McChezborger

    You just make something that takes shorter to turn. Like if the F3F took 2 seconds to turn, you make something that can do it faster

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    Also@McChezborger how am I’m suppose to make a plane that goes 200 move like a f3f if the f3f goes 350 mph

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @McChezborger ok

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,303 McChezborger

    @Hahahahaahahshs multiple submissions are allowed. I would suggest finding a realistic F3F here and testing your plane against that

    1.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    @McChezborger Reply
    The thing is I thought of the idea so fast that I just made it

    2.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    Yeah

    2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,303 McChezborger

    @Hahahahaahahshs it looks really good though

    2.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @McChezborger But I do play warthunder

    2.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @McChezborger tbh I did Kinda rushed on it yesterday an also I don’t know the roll speed for a f3f

    2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,303 McChezborger

    Rating:
    Looks: 3/5. I like the design, just looks rushed
    Performance: 2/5. Is not fast enough, pitch is too weak, cannot outperform F3F
    Realism: 3/5. Flys realistically enough, just not enough detail to warrant anything higher
    Total score: 8/15

    2.0 years ago