Profile image

Junyur Class Warship

36.2k DbE  6.9 years ago
49 downloads

|Junyur Class|
The Junyur class was a ship designed and made by the Tinlandian Navy in 1682. Being that they had advanced technology this was a advanced ship for their navy. In case of engine failure it also had sails.

|Time usage|
1683-1741

|Operation|
The new design was easily produced as it could be floated up to the waves as Tinland lives under the seabed of nordic areas so this was more easily built unlike other designs. It saw combat once when It came across a British ship heading the New England. It sank the British ship easily and no known survivors. Finding that this ship was carrying guns they found out what the word had to pack a punch.

|Arms|
10x 50mm breach loader
1x 250mm turret breach loader (hand cranked)

|Controls|
Yaw- power
Throttle- throttle
roll- turn
AG1- activate 250mm
VTOL- turn gun
Trim- raise gun
AG2- active broadside cannons (starbord)
AG3- active broadside cannons (port)

|Armor|
15-50mm

General Characteristics

  • Successors 1 airplane(s)
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 16.4ft (5.0m)
  • Length 86.0ft (26.2m)
  • Height 46.6ft (14.2m)
  • Empty Weight 29,960lbs (13,589kg)
  • Loaded Weight 99,859lbs (45,295kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.02
  • Wing Loading 10,602.6lbs/ft2 (51,766.2kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 9.4ft2 (0.9m2)
  • Drag Points 29659

Parts

  • Number of Parts 212
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 584
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @Stellarlabs I did make a variation of this now its a lot faster and is a stealth corvette

    6.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    36.2k DbE

    @arcues which*

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,354 arcues

    @Patton2 historicly ships dident have armour destroyers thickest armour was the plateing covering the guns witch is 25mm thick

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    36.2k DbE

    @Aarons123 Armor used is Tinlandian Steel. It is very similar to Rolled homogeneous. Modern Tinlandian things use tinarium. A lot stronger than Homogeneous

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.4k Aarons123

    @Patton2 back then, 50 mm would have
    bounced musket balls and very small cannon balls but the amount of armour you would need to stop large cannon ball would be probably 70 mm ish and back then the armour wasn’t to good at stopping projectiles so 70 mm would act more like 50 mm of the armour used on WW2 tanks (rolled homogeneous)

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    36.2k DbE

    @Patton2 same with wood. Cannons cut through it like butter.

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    36.2k DbE

    Its a historic build of Tinland

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    36.2k DbE

    @Patton2 What do you expect from a ship that is from the 1700s? Ships of that time usually used wood as well.

    6.9 years ago