USS Jimmy Carter SSN-23
50.4k Stingray
6.8 years ago
The USS Jimmy Carter (SSN-23), a nuclear submarine commisioned in 2005, was faster, and retrofitted with Harpoon and Tomahawk missiles, in addition to Mk84 torpedoes.
-> Steer=roll, forward=throttle.
-> Cockpit view, select Air-to-Ground weapons:
--- Three long-range Tomahawks (Cleavers) range 10 miles, Ag=1,2,3 using radar lock-on.
--- Thirty Harpoons (Infernos) range 1-4.3 miles, Ag=5,6,7 using radar lock-on.
--- Two Mk84 torpedoes, range 0.1-1 mile, Ag=4.
Notice: this build's weapons are fully functional, and will eliminate both the USS Beast and USS Tiny II fleets.
Specifications
Spotlights
- EpicPigster1 6.8 years ago
General Characteristics
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 13.1ft (4.0m)
- Length 101.7ft (31.0m)
- Height 23.2ft (7.1m)
- Empty Weight N/A
- Loaded Weight 47,710lbs (21,641kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 2.26
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.026
- Wing Loading 2,026.3lbs/ft2 (9,893.1kg/m2)
- Wing Area 23.5ft2 (2.2m2)
- Drag Points 11299
Parts
- Number of Parts 226
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 979
How is this for the Air Force?
Thank you @Tang0five
Thank you @Delta74
@Stingray Thanks. Now if only SP offered a more cinematic background to make videos, and made scripting available so players could script their own little cutscenes, SP would explode, I think. If someone took the gameplay of SP and ported it to an Eve Online level of graphics, that game would live forever. Imagine people making their own Star Wars movies, or something completely original.
Thank you @CoolPeach
Agree. Your previews are great! @SledDriver
@Stingray I had the same problem, I'd upload builds with great functionality and nobody would notice because people just look at the thumbnails without ever bothering to download anything. Then I realised you have to show them the functionality. GIFs in the description work well for this. Once I started doing that, I started getting comments saying "oh wow this works so well!" and so on. Funny thing is my builds have been doing the same things for many months now. Oh well. Can't change people.
Thanks @SledDriver
@Stingray Yep :) I learned now, I used to only vote for looks too. But I learned, and the rest if the SP community should too.
@EpicPigster1 Thx for the spotlight!
@EpicPigster1 Thank you very much; you truly understand the trend in SP voting.
Very nice. Love the functionality of it. It's a shame most SP users vote for looks.
@CRJ900Pilot I've deleted over 2,000 points of builds posted over 12 months ago, and will likely do so again - guess I'm not really keeping score.
@CRJ900Pilot Thx. More Spotlights=more votes. BTW most SP users by far vote without testing actual builds. (It would be interesting if Jundroo disabled voting until a user really downloads builds that are posted.)
I’m wondering though, how are you plat? At most you get 2-10 upvotes on stuff
Cool needs more attention
Thanks @Gestour
Thanks @WalrusManufacturingCo2
Thanks @MEERKAT978
Thanks @JackTheBestBoss
Thanks @Helicopterboy