Profile image

[Boeing] B-1B Lancer

4,831 EvionSystems  2.2 years ago

The Bone

The B-1 was first envisioned in the 1960s as a platform that would combine the Mach 2 speed of the B-58 Hustler with the range and payload of the B-52, and was meant to ultimately replace both bombers. After a long series of studies, Rockwell International (now part of Boeing) won the design contest for what emerged as the B-1A. This version had a top speed of Mach 2.2 at high altitude and the capability of flying for long distances at Mach 0.85 at very low altitudes. The combination of the high cost of the aircraft, the introduction of the AGM-86 cruise missile that flew the same basic speed and distance, and early work on the stealth bomber all significantly reduced the need for the B-1. This led to the program being canceled in 1977, after the B-1A prototypes had been built.

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 4 airplane(s) +14 bonus
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 61.5ft (18.8m)
  • Length 67.1ft (20.5m)
  • Height 16.3ft (5.0m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 47,261lbs (21,437kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.112
  • Wing Loading 94.3lbs/ft2 (460.4kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 501.2ft2 (46.6m2)
  • Drag Points 6412

Parts

  • Number of Parts 410
  • Control Surfaces 5
  • Performance Cost 2,336
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    6,419 dabestsock

    @OUSSAMAD it's lower now at least

    10 months ago
  • Profile image
    6,419 dabestsock

    @OUSSAMAD as American the north vietnamese were so good at attacking

    10 months ago
  • Profile image

    @OUSSAMAD The B-1 was introduced earlier, and had it’s first flight earlier as well. Plus, there were 104 B-1 built and only 36 Tu-160 built. Plus the Tu-160 only had 27 serial models, the other 9 were test models. Please take the last 3 letters of you name and stay that way.

    +2 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,748 OUSSAMAD

    @EvionSystems i dont know why americans see their self a gods 😂😂😂

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,831 EvionSystems

    Javelins dont think so @OUSSAMAD

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,748 OUSSAMAD

    @EvionSystems
    Also t-90 is successful

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,748 OUSSAMAD

    @EvionSystems
    Say that to Vietnamese mother with ak-47

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,831 EvionSystems

    We never used Abrams in Vietnam and the Abrams is a very successful vehicle. The U.S demolished Vietnam just look at their losses. We “lost” because we didn’t stop Vietnam from becoming communists. We won on the battlefield but not politically. @OUSSAMAD

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,748 OUSSAMAD

    @EvionSystems
    We saw your abrams in vietnam and iraq

    BREAKING NEWS

    USA THE SUPERPOWER COUNTRY CAN'T INVADE VIETNAM!!

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,831 EvionSystems

    Tanks… nope yall fucking turrets fly off with the slightest touch. A T-80 is a literally space agency @OUSSAMAD

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,748 OUSSAMAD

    @EvionSystems usa is better in technology but russia better in missiles/tanks/bombs/missiles

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,831 EvionSystems

    Simply not true. The U.S admitted that russia and china is ahead of us in hypersonic missile tech. We are better in somethings for example stealth tech and space travel @OUSSAMAD

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,831 EvionSystems

    Grow up having 7,000 warheads for what when just 100 will kill everyone on this damn planet. No one wins in nuclear war and your daddy vladdy will run away into a bunker. Our presidents aren’t gonna care abt us when they press that button @OUSSAMAD

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,748 OUSSAMAD

    @EvionSystems
    WIKI IS AMERICAN WEB OFCOURSE THEY WILL SAY AMERICA IS BETTER THAN RUSSIA

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,748 OUSSAMAD

    @EvionSystems

    SAY THAT TO RUSSIAN'S 7.000 NUCLEAR WARHEADS ☢️☢️☢️☢️☢️☢️☢️☢️

    2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,831 EvionSystems

    Bruh you dudes are the mfs that call the SU-57 a 5th gen fighter while it has a Radar cross section of a damn F-18 @OUSSAMAD

    +2 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,831 EvionSystems

    You russian weirdo’s even copied the engine inlet design @OUSSAMAD

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,831 EvionSystems

    Where do you even get your facts from? Russian propaganda?? 💀@OUSSAMAD

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,831 EvionSystems

    You can literally search it up. The TU-160 was built in response to the B-1 lancer. The B-1 took its first flight before the TU-160. And the B-1 has a better payload. Which can carry load of conventional munitions and stealth cruise missiles. It is also Semi-stealth. The TU-160 is something but it cant compare to the B-1B especially its modifications @OUSSAMAD

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,748 OUSSAMAD

    @EvionSystems tu-160 project start before b-1 project if you didnt know
    And tu-160 is more usefully and can carry cruise missiles just look how they are destroying Ukraine

    +2 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,831 EvionSystems

    Get your facts straight before u start talking @OUSSAMAD

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,831 EvionSystems

    Wrong more like Russia copying off of America but making a shitter version of the B-1. The B-1A program started in 1969 long before the TU-160 was even thought of.@OUSSAMAD

    +1 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    8,748 OUSSAMAD

    When America copy russia work

    +2 2.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,831 EvionSystems

    @andrewgarrison can we get an update

    +1 2.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,814 Ashdenpaw1

    Dang I love the heat waves coming off of the engines

    +1 2.2 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments