Profile image

P-51 Mustang [BETA REMASTER]

710 GingerDeadshot  9.2 years ago
69 downloads
No Tags
Auto Credit Based on PhilipTarpley's P-51 Mustang

EDIT: If you're that convinced that the plane I uploaded is the same as the default, /actually check the default plane included in the beta./ It's the same as the old default plane.

A beta remaster of the P-51 Mustang model included with the app. The blocks were replaced with the new fuselage pieces and the structure was fine-tuned to work with the new propeller.

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor P-51 Mustang
  • Successors 1 airplane(s)
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 50.6ft (15.4m)
  • Length 32.8ft (10.0m)
  • Height 13.0ft (4.0m)
  • Empty Weight 22lbs (10kg)
  • Loaded Weight 45lbs (20kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 3.428
  • Wing Loading 0.1lbs/ft2 (0.6kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 378.7ft2 (35.2m2)
  • Drag Points 1570

Parts

  • Number of Parts 24
  • Control Surfaces 5
  • Performance Cost 234
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    Looks like a Stuka a little lol
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,802 PuhBuhGuh
    @Kirbyshammer Dude, I really don't care if you delete everything. Go ahead if you are so insistent. If you think I am trolling you, read my argument. They are clear arguments, not annoying little comments directed to get you angry, more because you hadn't apologized for causing a ruckus and a whole lot of arguing. I also don't want to not even respond to a comment, as it makes me look as if I have given up entirely. Now that he has gotten an apology, the case really is settled. As for my comment mentioning the deleted comments, that was a joke to Mr. Gingerdeadshot that was supposed to get a brief smile on his part. Not yours.
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    @PuhBuhGuh Also, I feel like you are just trolling me at this point.
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    @PuhBuhGuh alright. Like I said, I have a plane that looks identical to this one, uses beta parts. They just happen to have different stats. I'm sorry, I thought I had evidence. But for you to attack me after it had been settled is simply not ok. I deleted those comments because they were irrelevant... If you attack me one more time, I will delete everything, all my planes, my account, and be done with this community.
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,802 PuhBuhGuh
    @Kirbyshammer No, I am not kidding. This plane clearly uses the new parts and is obviously a newer version of the stock p-51. The Wing shape is different, it uses new landing gear, a new propeller, and is stated in the description that it is SUPPOSED to look like the stock plane. Also, it just happens that the stats are different? Stats don't simply change when they feel like it. They change when the plane is changed. Have you seen any of the other people who "reposted" a stock plane when they updated every bit of it? They even get good ratings from th devs themselves, the plane's builders, saying that they made a great update to a great plane. Did you rate them like crap too?
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    I honestly felt he was cheating me. I'm sorry, that should be good enough.
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    @PuhBuhGuh Unreasonable? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? I have a plane that also uses beta parts, that comes FROM THE BASE GAME. I had every reason to accuse him. It just happens that the stats were slightly different. as a matter of fact, the one I had flies better. The fact that you continue is irritating and stupid.
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    @PuhBuhGuh *salutes*
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,802 PuhBuhGuh
    @Kirbyshammer You still didn't give him the apology you owe him for your unreasonable and uninformed accusations. Dude, this plane obviously uses beta parts, has different stats, and the successor system only says it's a successor when he used the same save when he started building. Case closed a while ago.
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    Thanks, @LordofLego.
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    @Kirbyshammer Yeah, alright. Sorry for trashing your methods and planes.
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    Four planes... The jets? Those actually each took about a day to make. I tried to make them as perfect as I could, aesthetically and physically. The first one was a concept, second was an aesthetic and technical improvement, third was a purely aesthetic concept, and the last was a technical improvement. @Kirbyshammer
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    And you did the same. You insulted my planes and motives. I'd like the apology now. @Kirbyshammer
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    The only technical aspects that are the same are wing loading and control surfaces. Everything else is completely different. @Kirbyshammer
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    16.2k LordofLego
    ^ Haters gonna hate. I believe you.
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    @Kirbyshammer I made mine to work with the existing parts, yet maintain similarity to the original, when either flying or observing. And yet it still manages to be different.
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    @Kirbyshammer My plane: General Characteristics Predecessor P-51 Mustang Created On iOS Wingspan 50.6ft (15.4m) Length 32.8ft (10.0m) Height 13.0ft (4.0m) Empty Weight 22lbs (10kg) Loaded Weight 45lbs (20kg) Performance Power/Weight Ratio 3.428 Wing Loading 0.1lbs/ft2 (0.6kg/m2) Wing Area 378.7ft2 (35.2m2) Drag Points 1570 Parts Number of Parts 24 Control Surfaces 5 The one you uploaded: General Characteristics Predecessor P-51 Mustang Created On Android Wingspan 49.0ft (14.9m) Length 30.8ft (9.4m) Height 13.6ft (4.1m) Empty Weight 26lbs (12kg) Loaded Weight 45lbs (20kg) Performance Power/Weight Ratio 2.45 Wing Loading 0.1lbs/ft2 (0.6kg/m2) Wing Area 370.8ft2 (34.4m2) Drag Points 1508 Parts Number of Parts 47 Control Surfaces 5
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    I have trouble believing that. Most likely a coincidence. Can you upload the plane temporarily so I can see it?@Kirbyshammer
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    I don't want a five star rating. I want an honest rating. The apology, yes. @Kirbyshammer
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k JacobHardy64
    @GingerDeadshot i dont mind, I use a joystick. I just dont like the sliding :/ not your fault though
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    @Kirbyshammer This is my plane. Did you try flying them, maybe?
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    @JacobHardy64 Thanks for letting me know! The only thing I wasn't happy about was that bouncing on takeoff... But oh well, I'm sure the newer version that the devs will create will be amazing.
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    25.2k JacobHardy64
    @GingerDeadshot its pretty cool, you did excellent keeping the same size/design while using the new parts
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    /get. out./ @Kirbyshammer
    9.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    Thank you, @JacobHardy64. At least someone here actually reads. What did you think)
    9.2 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments