P-51 Mustang [BETA REMASTER]
710 GingerDeadshot
9.2 years ago
No Tags
Auto Credit Based on PhilipTarpley's P-51 Mustang
EDIT: If you're that convinced that the plane I uploaded is the same as the default, /actually check the default plane included in the beta./ It's the same as the old default plane.
A beta remaster of the P-51 Mustang model included with the app. The blocks were replaced with the new fuselage pieces and the structure was fine-tuned to work with the new propeller.
Specifications
Spotlights
- TheRadarTruckGuy 7 months ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor P-51 Mustang
- Successors 1 airplane(s)
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 50.6ft (15.4m)
- Length 32.8ft (10.0m)
- Height 13.0ft (4.0m)
- Empty Weight 22lbs (10kg)
- Loaded Weight 45lbs (20kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 3.428
- Wing Loading 0.1lbs/ft2 (0.6kg/m2)
- Wing Area 378.7ft2 (35.2m2)
- Drag Points 1570
Parts
- Number of Parts 24
- Control Surfaces 5
- Performance Cost 234
Comments
- Log in to leave a comment
-
307 Mistermann124Looks like a Stuka a little lol9.2 years ago
-
3,802 PuhBuhGuh@Kirbyshammer Dude, I really don't care if you delete everything. Go ahead if you are so insistent. If you think I am trolling you, read my argument. They are clear arguments, not annoying little comments directed to get you angry, more because you hadn't apologized for causing a ruckus and a whole lot of arguing. I also don't want to not even respond to a comment, as it makes me look as if I have given up entirely. Now that he has gotten an apology, the case really is settled. As for my comment mentioning the deleted comments, that was a joke to Mr. Gingerdeadshot that was supposed to get a brief smile on his part. Not yours.9.2 years ago
-
251 Kirbyshammer@PuhBuhGuh Also, I feel like you are just trolling me at this point.9.2 years ago
-
251 Kirbyshammer@PuhBuhGuh alright. Like I said, I have a plane that looks identical to this one, uses beta parts. They just happen to have different stats. I'm sorry, I thought I had evidence. But for you to attack me after it had been settled is simply not ok. I deleted those comments because they were irrelevant... If you attack me one more time, I will delete everything, all my planes, my account, and be done with this community.9.2 years ago
-
3,802 PuhBuhGuh@Kirbyshammer No, I am not kidding. This plane clearly uses the new parts and is obviously a newer version of the stock p-51. The Wing shape is different, it uses new landing gear, a new propeller, and is stated in the description that it is SUPPOSED to look like the stock plane. Also, it just happens that the stats are different? Stats don't simply change when they feel like it. They change when the plane is changed. Have you seen any of the other people who "reposted" a stock plane when they updated every bit of it? They even get good ratings from th devs themselves, the plane's builders, saying that they made a great update to a great plane. Did you rate them like crap too?9.2 years ago
-
251 KirbyshammerI honestly felt he was cheating me. I'm sorry, that should be good enough.9.2 years ago
-
251 Kirbyshammer@PuhBuhGuh Unreasonable? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? I have a plane that also uses beta parts, that comes FROM THE BASE GAME. I had every reason to accuse him. It just happens that the stats were slightly different. as a matter of fact, the one I had flies better. The fact that you continue is irritating and stupid.9.2 years ago
-
710 GingerDeadshot@PuhBuhGuh *salutes*9.2 years ago
-
3,802 PuhBuhGuh@Kirbyshammer You still didn't give him the apology you owe him for your unreasonable and uninformed accusations. Dude, this plane obviously uses beta parts, has different stats, and the successor system only says it's a successor when he used the same save when he started building. Case closed a while ago.9.2 years ago
-
710 GingerDeadshotThanks, @LordofLego.9.2 years ago
-
710 GingerDeadshot@Kirbyshammer Yeah, alright. Sorry for trashing your methods and planes.9.2 years ago
-
710 GingerDeadshotFour planes... The jets? Those actually each took about a day to make. I tried to make them as perfect as I could, aesthetically and physically. The first one was a concept, second was an aesthetic and technical improvement, third was a purely aesthetic concept, and the last was a technical improvement. @Kirbyshammer9.2 years ago
-
710 GingerDeadshotAnd you did the same. You insulted my planes and motives. I'd like the apology now. @Kirbyshammer9.2 years ago
-
710 GingerDeadshotThe only technical aspects that are the same are wing loading and control surfaces. Everything else is completely different. @Kirbyshammer9.2 years ago
-
16.2k LordofLego^ Haters gonna hate. I believe you.9.2 years ago
-
710 GingerDeadshot@Kirbyshammer I made mine to work with the existing parts, yet maintain similarity to the original, when either flying or observing. And yet it still manages to be different.9.2 years ago
-
710 GingerDeadshot@Kirbyshammer My plane: General Characteristics Predecessor P-51 Mustang Created On iOS Wingspan 50.6ft (15.4m) Length 32.8ft (10.0m) Height 13.0ft (4.0m) Empty Weight 22lbs (10kg) Loaded Weight 45lbs (20kg) Performance Power/Weight Ratio 3.428 Wing Loading 0.1lbs/ft2 (0.6kg/m2) Wing Area 378.7ft2 (35.2m2) Drag Points 1570 Parts Number of Parts 24 Control Surfaces 5 The one you uploaded: General Characteristics Predecessor P-51 Mustang Created On Android Wingspan 49.0ft (14.9m) Length 30.8ft (9.4m) Height 13.6ft (4.1m) Empty Weight 26lbs (12kg) Loaded Weight 45lbs (20kg) Performance Power/Weight Ratio 2.45 Wing Loading 0.1lbs/ft2 (0.6kg/m2) Wing Area 370.8ft2 (34.4m2) Drag Points 1508 Parts Number of Parts 47 Control Surfaces 59.2 years ago
-
710 GingerDeadshotI have trouble believing that. Most likely a coincidence. Can you upload the plane temporarily so I can see it?@Kirbyshammer9.2 years ago
-
710 GingerDeadshotI don't want a five star rating. I want an honest rating. The apology, yes. @Kirbyshammer9.2 years ago
-
25.2k JacobHardy64@GingerDeadshot i dont mind, I use a joystick. I just dont like the sliding :/ not your fault though9.2 years ago
-
710 GingerDeadshot@Kirbyshammer This is my plane. Did you try flying them, maybe?9.2 years ago
-
710 GingerDeadshot@JacobHardy64 Thanks for letting me know! The only thing I wasn't happy about was that bouncing on takeoff... But oh well, I'm sure the newer version that the devs will create will be amazing.9.2 years ago
-
25.2k JacobHardy64@GingerDeadshot its pretty cool, you did excellent keeping the same size/design while using the new parts9.2 years ago
-
710 GingerDeadshot/get. out./ @Kirbyshammer9.2 years ago
-
710 GingerDeadshotThank you, @JacobHardy64. At least someone here actually reads. What did you think)9.2 years ago
- Log in to see more comments