An example of an upgraded, and safer FL-20 . . . it can fly better at higher altitudes and is less likely to have complications along the way. The 30mm cannon has also been shifted around.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 49.8ft (15.2m)
- Length 65.7ft (20.0m)
- Height 19.2ft (5.8m)
- Empty Weight 16,610lbs (7,534kg)
- Loaded Weight 23,421lbs (10,623kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.439
- Wing Loading 30.2lbs/ft2 (147.5kg/m2)
- Wing Area 775.5ft2 (72.1m2)
- Drag Points 5178
Parts
- Number of Parts 95
- Control Surfaces 9
- Performance Cost 545
@PyrusEnderhunter
@GoldenEagle
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation would be appreciated
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation thank you
@Squirrel Will do.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation You think you could keep your opinions of others on this site to yourself, please? Hate speech is not tolerated on this site.
@TemDesBur do you want me to unblock you?
Why did you block me? @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@Pilotmario yeh I accidentally unblocked PINK. now I need to wait 2 more days.
This thing@Pilotmario
@PINK He uploaded it?
@Pilotmario The DT-03 does exist, other than that, I agree.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation To be honest, @DankDorito has exaggerated the abilities of his aircraft, and mentioned an aircraft which has not been uploaded (I checked, but if I am wrong, direct me to it), therefore according to RP purposes, it does not exist.
The aircraft in question is the DT-01 and the DT-03.
The DT-01 is a terrible aircraft. While fast, the acceleration is sluggish and the fuel consumption excessive, mostly due to the use of obsolete powerplants. I suggest more modern engines, such as those from deusalgor's set or from my high-efficiency powerpack.
In addition, DT-01 had a terrible combination of high roll sensitivity and low pitch sensitivity, making it tricky to control. To say the least, it is terrible. I'd rather take a Pummeler to a fight with jets than that thing.
The DT-03, at the time of this writing, does not exist. I assume that he will upload it in the future.
While in-game performance of ground and watercraft is not accounted for in this RP, the in-game performance of aircraft are.
Also, I do not think using put-downs will come to good. Calling someone "irrelevant" is certainly not good. Any moderator will put some blame for the situation due to the insult. Believe me, dealing with adults is often very similar to dealing with children, just with a slightly wider vocabulary. Cue Donald Cheetoskin Trump.
Even if @PINK was a complete a--hole (which I do not think so, but that's my opinion), you do not have to respond to them. Just ignore them. They do have a "block user" feature for a reason.
\/
\/@TemDesBur @Pilotmario
You just put me down . . . also . . . I rarely attack people on this site . . . more their creations that could need some help.
Also of note, Dorito brought it upon himself. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@PINK nice
Of course we have missiles with shorter ranges aswell, and autocannons. @Supermini555
We use, in roleplays, missiles that often have ranges of over 90 miles. @Supermini555
I know, that's why we have 9 mile range missiles, but if your missiles can go further, I don't know
@Supermini555 However, the missiles we use significantly out range them.
So, it's an aerial fighter tank, but it has it's electro teslas that it can shoot in all directions, but can't be replicated in game, similar to an all aspect missile @PINK
@Supermini555 It hasn't, ever . . . although it has had better endurance than all of them.
Well, it used to @PINK
The roll rate of the DT-01 is excessive, and the pitch rate is sluggish. The F-8C Cobra is faster and flies farther. @DankDorito
@Supermini555 It doesn't even keep up . . . or out turn it.