lockheed C-133 Advanced Hercules
15 GoldyWorman
7.5 years ago
Auto Credit Based on gaiteironet123's lockeed C130 Hércules
Advanced version of an old lockheed Martin C-130 series with such a wide range of improvements and design changes.... brand new C-133 Advanced hercules is still waiting for you.... improved wide fuselage... powerful propulsions.... covering short takeoff and landing ..... simpleplane..... simple design... simple controls... mobile friendly..... superior mantic cockpit...my first design thats all Thank You ..
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor lockeed C130 Hércules
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 69.9ft (21.3m)
- Length 63.3ft (19.3m)
- Height 17.8ft (5.4m)
- Empty Weight 17,138lbs (7,773kg)
- Loaded Weight 27,525lbs (12,485kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.435
- Wing Loading 22.8lbs/ft2 (111.4kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,206.9ft2 (112.1m2)
- Drag Points 8269
Parts
- Number of Parts 109
- Control Surfaces 15
- Performance Cost 645
@GoldyWorman
If you want to avoid such situations, you should ask the original creator and mention him in the description.
@CALVIN232 if you are not a blind just check it out ..... Differences b/w this and the real one that i was used....... Bru stop jealous from new bies.....and am go along with you that i am using someones c130 design and its mention above (based on lockeed c130 hercules)....so why you posting such worthless comments? If i want i can delete your comment but i don't think so....because you have such a misunderstanding.....Thank you bro
So here are some design changes and improvements ⬇⬇⬇
C-130 (based model) / C-133 (my model)
Dragpoint- 8593 vs 8269
Wingarea- 970.1ft.sq vs 1206.9ft.sq
Wing loading- 26.1lbs/ft.sq vs 22.8lbs/ft
Length- 52.2ft vs 63.3ft
Wingspan- 63.2ft vs 69.9ft
Emptyweight- 3879kg vs 7773kg
And c133 is with advanced highly terrac 145• + 145• nose design and wide improved fuselage ..☝☝👍👍👍👍 thank you again bro ......
Copying is not nice and simply recolouring a build doesn't make it yours this is against the rules and as a result I've reported it to the moderators who will now deal with this