Profile image

B-9C

8,270 WizNick  2 months ago
Auto Credit Based on KPLBall's Otesk war Plane challenge

Note:

You don’t release the bombs with fireWeapons, instead you carpet-bomb with AG1
Try to not shoot yourself down, it might happen.


B-9C Bomber

Overview
The B-9C is a fictional American heavy/strategic bomber developed in the early 1930s, known for its innovative design and powerful armament. It was in service from May 5, 1934, until its retirement in 1958.

Design and Specifications
- Engines: 4 Radial Engines with Counter-Rotating Propellers
- Max Speed: 500-650 km/h
- Bomb Load Capacity: 40 x 500 lbs bombs

Defensive Armament
The B-9C was equipped with eleven .50 cal M2 machine guns, strategically placed for optimal coverage:
- 4 in the nose
- 2 in the roof turret
- 1 on each side of the waist
- 2 in the tail
- 1 for the bombardier

Service History
The B-9C began its operational life on May 5, 1934. It was deployed during significant conflicts of the era, adapting to the changing nature of aerial warfare. The bomber gained a reputation for its speed and defensive capabilities, playing a crucial role in strategic bombing missions.

Legacy
Retiring in 1958, the B-9C is remembered as a notable advancement in military aviation. Its design and operational history exemplify the technological innovations of the time and its impact on aerial combat tactics. The B-9C remains a symbol of the bravery and dedication of those who served in its cockpit.


If you’re reading this, thank you for reading my story. Mind leaving an upvote while you’re here? Thank you so much.

End of post


have a good day


General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Otesk war Plane challenge
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 82.2ft (25.1m)
  • Length 82.6ft (25.2m)
  • Height 25.9ft (7.9m)
  • Empty Weight 56,650lbs (25,696kg)
  • Loaded Weight 76,803lbs (34,837kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.156
  • Wing Loading 56.1lbs/ft2 (273.8kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1,369.7ft2 (127.3m2)
  • Drag Points 12408

Parts

  • Number of Parts 261
  • Control Surfaces 10
  • Performance Cost 2,092
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    29.5k KPLBall

    5/10 Looks
    6/10 function
    10/10 Relevance
    10/10 Weaponry
    10/10 description
    10/10 Country Roundel effort
    4/10 Camo effort
    4/10 Interior design
    10/10 Firepower
    7/10 speed
    8/10 Defense/armor
    7/10 Manuverability
    overall 91/120
    Pls pin

    Pinned 2 months ago
  • Profile image
    8,270 WizNick

    Also my brain was auto playing this song the whole time I was building this, just wanted to share it. THIS SONG

    Pinned 2 months ago
  • Profile image
    8,270 WizNick

    @MrOofington sure. I’m always experimenting on ways to make my tanks as realistic as possible while being simple and effective, and having someone else that doesn’t have a bias review my stuff before actual publication would be very helpful. Thanks

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    3,725 MrOofington

    If it would be fine, would you mind if you ping me on your tank builds? Thanks in advance.
    And also, can I test some upcoming tank builds so that I can inform you of their problems?

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    29.5k KPLBall

    @WizNick sick

    2 months ago
  • Profile image
    8,270 WizNick

    @KPLBall

    2 months ago