A very VERY small destroyer with plenty of weapons and a great targeting system that CAN'T be ripped out by techy red and yellow boi. AVG 1 activates the main turrets, which houses a very (as in one shot for explosion against ships) powerful armour piercing, high explosive auto-cannon, yaw and pitch and activates the main turret pitch for the targeting system. AVG 2 does the same but for the AA turret. Yaw for both turrets are the same but so AVG 3 activates yaw of the targeting system for both turrets. AVG 4 activates missile targeting mode with 90' pitch anf 360' yaw, used for SAMs and SSMs. has lots of flares
Specifications
Spotlights
- Monarchii 1.4 years ago
General Characteristics
- Created On Mac
- Wingspan 10.1ft (3.1m)
- Length 99.2ft (30.2m)
- Height 24.3ft (7.4m)
- Empty Weight 81,720lbs (37,067kg)
- Loaded Weight 204,035lbs (92,548kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 0.132
- Wing Loading 24,263.1lbs/ft2 (118,462.6kg/m2)
- Wing Area 8.4ft2 (0.8m2)
- Drag Points 16184
Parts
- Number of Parts 179
- Control Surfaces 1
- Performance Cost 818
@Graingy qowk
@MonarchiiwithastolenMG All right deal's off.
@Graingy wqofhkqawk
@MonarchiiwithastolenMG I'm tryna work here man I was hired to sell things :(
@Graingy waq
@MonarchiiwithastolenMG Hmm. Understandable, have a nice day.
On the other hand, we could perhaps build a few of these Starfish-class boats to bolster your fleet?
They're small but pack a heavy punch. Perfect for coastal defence against attack!
@Graingy *wquack*
@MonarchiiwithastolenMG But only dinosaurs quack?
@Graingy quack
@MonarchiiwithastolenMG My bad
@Graingy no, I'm pretty sure not..
@Monarchii This you?
@Graingy I have no idea, i am but an ignorant amphibian mammal
@Monarchii Japan?
Starting ventures?
Must be one of the same 3 megacorps.
(Or was that South Korea? Both?)
@Graingy ...I've heard Japan is starting a venture to that business too
@Monarchii We have no need for tech support.
@Graingy how about those Indian startups?
@Monarchii ... There's so many conversations going at once that I didn't check what prompted that question.
Aeroflot is currently Russian, so they can burn in... Well, I guess they're already in hell.
No, they don't. Roscosmos would (theoretically) be a better bet, but they'd probably get shot down by the orbital defence system.
@Graingy ...do Аерофлот delivers to mars?
@Monarchii Well...
SpaceX is a for-profit endeavour. Even taking out Musk, they have no soul and if their pursuits define the future use of space then our species' prospects will be forever ruined by self-interest.
FedEx is like, packages and shit.
NASA has more genuine intentions, the way I see it, seeing as they're not for-profit, but they're held on a short leash by politicians who only care about reelection and thus give them basically nothing to work with. By all means, space exploration should replace military as any country's biggest expenditure on development and advanced hardware, if you get what I'm saying.
In other words, I wish the Soviets made it to the moon first.
@Graingy idk, rambles? anyway, which one is better, SpaceX, FedEx, or NASA?
@Monarchii No, no, what does that mean?
Rocket, usually.
@Graingy I have no idea, would she? say how do you arrange interplanetary delivery again?
@Monarchii Hear me on that?
@Graingy i forgot you don't have hands... can you like, ask kindness to help you with that? will she even hear you on that though?