Profile image

Aerospatiale-BAC Concorde Singapore Airlines

85.9k Annedzsrue  4.3 years ago

The Concorde in SA livery

In the Cockpit

Night Time

Controls

AG2......................Thrust Reverse
AG3......................Enhanced Taxi Steering
AG4......................Droop Snoot
AG5......................Autopilot
Landing Gear......Landing Gear & Landing Lights
VTOL....................Weight shift
Trim.....................Trim

This Concorde features

  • Singapore Airlines Livery
  • Functional Cockpit Interior
  • Working Analog Instruments
  • Illuminated Windows
  • Elevons
  • FT Engine Performance
  • Droop Snoot
  • ASBS

Note

  • Takeoff Speed...380km/h
  • Max Speed(18km@100%Pwr)...2236km/h
  • Stall Speed...170Km/h

Peculiar Performance

  • Landing Speed(5%Pwr).......220Km/h
  • Alt. to exceed 1000km/h...3000m

Due to the COM is more forward than COL, landings would be noticeably harder, that is why weight shifts with VTOL in this Concorde like the actual thing. For Takeoffs and cruise: Set VTOL to +1 or highest to negate pitching up movements, for landings: Set VTOL to - 1 or lowest to shift the COM much closer to COL, to ease and improve control surfaces response.

This Concorde is just like the real thing; A complex piece of engineering. More Funky Trees coding has been put in this project than in all of my other projects as engine performance is the biggest concern in this project; Too weak at ground and at steep pitch angles, and powerful at high altitudes and level flight.

This code:

 (clamp((((AltitudeAgl/ 10000) - 0.0075) * (Throttle)), 0, 1.25))/ (clamp((PitchAngle/ 15), 1, 15))

Is what is utilised to achieve the desired engine performance. Here are the variables explained:

  • 10000: This is the AltitudeAgl when the engine would reach full power to overcome 2000km/h.
  • 0.0075: The AltitudeAgl variable as to when the FT would kick in, in this case its 75m as 75/10000=0.0075. In case of 7628m dividant, it would then be 75/7628=0.009832.
  • 1.25: The ‘max’ in the Engine, so in this case. The min/max in the engines are 0/1.25. If your max is 1 in your engines, then max would be 1 in the clamp(x, min, max) operator.
  • 15: The angle of the aircraft to which the engine loses power. Both must be the same digit! clamp((PitchAngle/ 15), 1, 15). It is important that in this formula, the ‘min’ stays at 1 as below that would be decimals which instead of decreasing the power, it multiplies it.

Be aware though that if you are using this formula, that your aircraft weighs almost the same as the real thing, or more because if its too light, it could accelerate like a rocket even at 90° Pitch due to the nature of the formula increasing power for every increase in altitude.

The timing for droop snoot is easily achieved by using the smooth operator, setting all to the same increment and all have the speed set at 100%. Although since it uses a smooth function, it will not work on any updates prior to 1.9.204.

I would have went for Air France or British Airways for the livery but since the majority of Concordes in this site offers said liveries, I went ahead with Singapore Airlines to offer something new and everyone could enjoy rather than something already existing.

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 17 airplane(s) +112 bonus
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 82.7ft (25.2m)
  • Length 207.3ft (63.2m)
  • Height 41.4ft (12.6m)
  • Empty Weight N/A
  • Loaded Weight 181,451lbs (82,305kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.3
  • Wing Loading 43.7lbs/ft2 (213.5kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 4,148.8ft2 (385.4m2)
  • Drag Points 24019

Parts

  • Number of Parts 733
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 3,392
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    2,716 Cestbon

    @1714

    10 months ago
  • Profile image

    What’s the plane in the background in picture 3 from up to down?

    +1 1.8 years ago
  • Profile image

    This plane is way too quick on controlling . I tested it and in both tests the plane crashed shorty after took off. In one test, when l wanna the plane to rise a little, it quickly go up straight and go down. So please improve the controls ability, thanks.

    1.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    0 ShoxBR

    agree in my opinion well worked, running smooth on mobile

    2.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    where can I find that CV-990 with TU-154 landing gear and 3 turboprops in the background

    +3 2.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @poopyamba why is bc SIA actually used it

    2.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @poopyamba no is not

    2.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,568 IndoMaja

    @poopyamba Singapore Airlines actually had the Concorde... leased from British Airways

    2.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    is anyone gonna talk about the dc-10 has propellers

    2.5 years ago
  • Profile image

    This plane is great. Can I use the Concorde cockpit?

    2.8 years ago
  • Profile image
    292 Bike36

    this is illegal it is singapore airlines

    3.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    Bro i really love this Concorde 11000/10 😁👍

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    Hey, I tested it out and I like it overall. However, the drag is too high (can't gain speed with a slight negative pitch angle gliding, something under 8000 would be better), and wing loading is a bit too low. I might build a Concorde some time and see if I can get this right.

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    how to do an vertical takeoff in this boi:
    1.activate ag5
    2. pull the yoke up
    3. go full power
    4. and there you go an vertical takeoff in this boi

    +9 4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    930 Maximum1

    Very cool

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    31.1k Spikerya

    @XP no clue :P

    4.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    30.0k TriStar

    No the tri prop@Spikerya

    4.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    31.1k Spikerya

    @Boeing7472 looks like a Tu-144

    4.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    What is plane in the background

    4.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    You should make the Pepsi version of the concord

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    Thanks man. I appreciate it @jelybaca

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    85.9k Annedzsrue

    @QantasGuyA330 I could but it may take a while if ever because of a new job, returning to class. And I still need to find an equivalent of it to publish it with. I may or may not build the Il-76 but I'll try.

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    Wow, very thorough explanation!
    Cool replica!

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    185 Airt

    我为什么无法控制他呢

    4.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    Can you build a mobile friendly (realistic as possible) Ilyushin IL-76
    That would be the best

    4.3 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments