@BRAZUCA

Uso um aplicativo de animação (sim de a n i m a ç ã o )
Nem faço animações mas é o Flipaclip

Inclusive meu próximo avião será postado hj msm, mas não vou colocar esse fundo branco pq acho meio sem graça

Eu quero muito saber até hoje como que coloca essa imagem do avião daquele jeito que você fez que deixou em volta branco

@extraordinaryman by the way, I have a somewhat unrealistic version of this plane, as it reaches 1000 kph, and goes up to 20,000 meters in altitude!

Here is the post that shows the development of the engine

@extraordinaryman

:)

@Dragorans Thank you for your reply, I hope you understand that I am more about communicating this technology. In fact, I support its development, but for objective consideration, it is necessary for me to remind that this technology has limitations but can be overcome.
While I'm progressively pursuing authenticity including momentum, there will be people who prefer dynamics that are too strong to be realistic.
In addition, your aircraft is really good, and the power decay at high altitude is very realistic. In recent months, the power of my regular engine modified with xml has also been reduced at high altitudes.

@extraordinaryman

Well, I know that this system isn't the most efficient, and that it loses power at high altitudes, but it's also the best way I've found to make electric single engine aircraft without counter-rotating propellers. Because of this, it is much better suited for a general aviation aircraft.

It also doesn't change the plane's maneuverability much, as I also discovered that the propellers can act as canards. And because it is always rotating, upward lift is almost cancelled, although I found that it modifies (and A LOT) the Yaw, making the plane go into flatspin! But this can be corrected just by lowering the angle of the rotator that does yaw.

And engine not giving an astronomical climb rate is pretty realistic I might say!

But anyway, thanks for your reviews :)

Summary: It's really not impecable

However, it is normal for its power to decay with altitude, you can still fly very high, but it will take a long time

I am very happy to see this plane, it flies smoothly

I built a similar powered aircraft a few months ago, but the performance of this type of power is severely degraded at high altitudes. The free-turning JointRotator counteracts the torque, reducing transmission efficiency. A pair of coaxial counter-propellers is recommended, but do not put a free-turning JointRotator behind a powered JointRotator. This will give you the same stable flight, better climb

If you still prefer a single propeller with a free-spinning JointRotator, it doesn't matter, you can modify the function of this axis to increase with height.

If there is something unclear, please point it out.

@Titaninfernal1 notei kkkk

@Dragorans eu voltei para meu nome original

@Titaninferna

@AlmostADev
@Aviator01
@Juno