Since the .60 Cal MKIII was up to 10$ USD a shot, they needed something cheaper, so the .90 Cal was invented, for the .60 Cal is more effective, the .90 Cal was able to weaken heavy armor, and pierce through at about 3 shots, the bullets are also cheap, it cost as much as .75$ USD. The bullet was then named 'The Cheap Shot' since a .90 Cal is now more common then a .60 on snipers
Specifications
Spotlights
- Smasher 7.8 years ago
General Characteristics
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 2.0ft (0.6m)
- Length 11.1ft (3.4m)
- Height 2.1ft (0.6m)
- Empty Weight 249lbs (113kg)
- Loaded Weight 249lbs (113kg)
Performance
- Wing Loading 439,839.3lbs/ft2 (2,147,483.6kg/m2)
- Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
- Drag Points 139
Parts
- Number of Parts 6
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 16
@KillShot86 ☺
Alright @Smasher
@KillShot86 I'm going by actual fact not fiction all I was doing is pointing out a odd fact
This isn't real, in the SNAS Timeline, railguns were made by the SNAA, but were proven to be less effective than guns, only because, a railgun can't damage a tank, as well as a .60 Cal can @Smasher
@KillShot86 funny how weapons that use magnets as a propellant that are more effective than bullets propelled by gun powder
@KillShot86 and I believe the railguns are being developed by a organization known as DARPA
Soon we won't be needing 90cal as we will soon have railguns mounted on ships and tanks and coil guns equipped to infantry i just read about it and the already exist and becoming more reliable than most weapons