Profile image

Buzzard

21.5k SimpleEric  8.3 years ago
12 downloads
Auto Credit Based on TTHHSSSS's |**CLOSED**|STOL CHALLENGE!

My entry for the STOL CHALLENGE! held by @TTHHSSSS.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Thank you @TTHHSSSS for the honorable mention! I'm really glad to have joined this great challenge!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The landing gear could sustain the falling shock from a very steep angle, so the landing distance could be greatly reduced. No XML modding.

Have fun!

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor |**CLOSED**|STOL CHALLENGE!
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 49.0ft (14.9m)
  • Length 31.2ft (9.5m)
  • Height 12.2ft (3.7m)
  • Empty Weight 4,729lbs (2,145kg)
  • Loaded Weight 5,828lbs (2,643kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.343
  • Wing Loading 16.6lbs/ft2 (81.2kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 350.3ft2 (32.5m2)
  • Drag Points 1809

Parts

  • Number of Parts 67
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 371
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    21.5k SimpleEric

    @Insertname Thank you!

    8.2 years ago
  • Profile image

    @SimpleEric Np

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k SimpleEric

    @FennVectorCWA Thank you!

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k SimpleEric

    @redbear89 Thank you for the upvote, dude : )

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k SimpleEric

    @TTHHSSSS You are quite welcome! Great challenge! Thank you for the upvote!

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    19.4k TTHHSSSS

    Awesome! Thanks for the entry!

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k SimpleEric

    @xXxMLGDOGE603xXx Thank you! Considering the original purpose of this game, it's much easier to shape a plane than a vehicle. I think maybe you should give it a try. All is up to your interest, but don't avoid to test it because of plane could crash.

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    @SimpleEric but I'm not in that challenge lol I'm bad at making planes

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image

    Cool

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    507 bilky

    oh

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k SimpleEric

    @bilky There are branches for offroad, one is for offroad climing and one is for offroad rushing. I think Baja is more of like the latter one.

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    507 bilky

    offroad ( i mean )

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    507 bilky

    but it just for ofroad

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k SimpleEric

    @bilky Okay, I see your whole point of view now. They actually runs fast in the canyon paths between Bandit and Yeager. And they could climb the 30 degrees' steep slope as well. So they were not lack of horsepowers. I guess it was the start up acceleration made you think they were slow. I didn't add more horsepowers to them was the concern about how they could handle in the wild. They will be less stable when a more powerful engine added. Acceleration and stableness are contradictions. In this dilemma I chose stableness rather than acceleration. But your advice is heard. I will add appropriate extra power to my next car. Thank you for your support!

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    507 bilky

    sorry if it offends

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    507 bilky

    because the baja is slow

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    507 bilky

    owh

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    21.5k SimpleEric

    @bilky Thank you! So far it seems there are no requirements for my application scenarios. I mentioned no XML modding here is just to clarify there are no overpower parts, though this plane could take off immediately when you start it. Sorry that I didn't describe it clearly and thank you for your concern!

    8.3 years ago
  • Profile image
    507 bilky

    do you want 12000hp engine

    8.3 years ago