First to whole, i must mention that this is NOT modification of my previous Su-57. It is fully rebuild aircraft and have nothing common except the original fighter.
So there are the advantages over the previous version: it has landing gears, more advanced mechanization of the wing, thrust vector control. The scale is almost real (length and width are 100% exact, and i missed half a meter in height).
Controls:
1 - Activates first 4 missiles and opens fuselage bay
2 - Activates second 4 missiles (do not activate until all the first 4 are not launched)
3 - Thrust vector control
4 - Parashute
5 - Afterburner
Flight recomendations:
1) TVC is useful in every direction only when your speed is higher than 700mph (but when 100% power) and intil the fuel level is >50%. If it's lower, aircraft will start so spin and may be broken, especially on high speed. But you can use it freely when pitching up OR rolling in every speed.
2) Safeful landing speed is nearly 150-180mph.
That's all for now. Hope you'll like it!
PS: It still can somersault in the air, you just need to find the right way:)
Specifications
Spotlights
- AircraftoftheRedStar 5.0 years ago
- GrizzlitnCFSP 5.0 years ago
- Mustang51 5.0 years ago
- hopotumon 5.0 years ago
- mikoyanster 5.0 years ago
- Mekomara 5.0 years ago
- DerVito 5.0 years ago
- HNL47 5.0 years ago
- Typhoon03 5.0 years ago
General Characteristics
- Successors 1 airplane(s) +14 bonus
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 45.9ft (14.0m)
- Length 63.6ft (19.4m)
- Height 13.8ft (4.2m)
- Empty Weight 33,640lbs (15,259kg)
- Loaded Weight 45,000lbs (20,411kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 2.996
- Wing Loading 41.9lbs/ft2 (204.4kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,074.7ft2 (99.8m2)
- Drag Points 10718
Parts
- Number of Parts 355
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 1,742
Bravo es el su 57 buen trabajo,👍
@TofuAviation well, as I said I'm sorry for how I acted
@Ballsosteel24
I've won multiple spelling bees during my younger years, but you didn't have to point that out nor point out mah boi @Empergyd 's spelling error
@TofuAviation don't know,I won the spelling bee many times in my country when I was younger and I hated to see the mistakes , sorry
@Ballsosteel24
just how immature do you have to be to even point out that one insignificant spelling mistake?
@Empergyd ok
@Ballsosteel24 Emmm, nooo...? What if i am a foreigner with a low level of english?:) Btw, this is not the first time, when i see this mention. My latest works are okay with this
If your making a plane your atleast supposed know how to spell "parachute" right😐
Wait they do? Oh shit.
@Subnerdica I can particularly agree for the shape, but statesment that Russia hasn't absorbing material sounded pretty funny. You know that for sure, right?)
Amazing build, though and the plane looks great!
@Empergyd
See all those curves? In real life, curves light up on the radar. Another part of stealth is the radar absorbing material, and I don’t think Russia even has any.
@Subnerdica Well,i think, they didn't copy. At least judging by airframe and the main units of the aircraft - they are absolutely different. And what about stealth - no one can exactly speak about it 'cause it is still unrevealed. Can you name me exact and proved value of the effective area of scattering (idk how it is in english, but i hope you've understood)?
@Empergyd noice
The soviets looked at the F-22, said that’s nice, screwed it up when they copied it, and still came out with a decent not-so-stealthy stealth fighter. Great build, though.
awesome
@nameisalreadytaken Thanks, guy!
@fulin
@Sadboye12
Thanks
@TheBlueRobotProduct
@Mr6371
Thanks
@Alienbeef0421 I was thinking about it. Yeah, its very likely (but then i should also remake cockpit height).
I get why you missed a meter in height, the vertical stabilizers should be 25-30% larger.
@Mustang51 Thanks, man:) I'm glad you liked it!
@NANOMAN Oh, this is such a high praise for me
This is a super nice build! Wonderfully made