Nice! I just posted a spitfire too!

Dude! Where are you? Come back! I want more of your planes!

@XVIindustries XD

I tried to write ahhhh fine man but it filled in as "against Fokker men" @Mkenz

@XVIindustries true.

@Mkenz autofill has us all buggered

@XVIindustries Excuse me for being a Spelling Nazi, but "Excude" should be "Excuse"

This one of, if not, THE best Spitfie I have seen on this site. And im a huge fan of the Spitfire. Thisis extremley accurate. Don't belive me? Heres a picture of a real Spitfire: https://www.google.com/search?q=supermarine+spitfire+mk+viii&rlz=1C1KMZB_enUS528US528&espv=2&biw=1280&bih=923&tbm=isch&imgil=TU0grS6iJSJnYM%253A%253BcEdt1cACEc3NXM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.hyperscale.com%25252F2010%25252Fgalleries%25252Fspitfireviii32tamiyacwbg_1.htm&source=iu&pf=m&fir=TU0grS6iJSJnYM%253A%252CcEdt1cACEc3NXM%252C_&usg=__NHvy0dEFcdIiUvvROhnSq7lQ_zw%3D&ved=0CDoQyjdqFQoTCLPrlsvZ3scCFYJdHgodMXsErA&ei=oD_qVbObOoK7ebH2keAK#imgrc=x9LgVRleDnsxoM%3A&usg=__NHvy0dEFcdIiUvvROhnSq7lQ_zw%3D Thats a Google Image link for you.

Yahyah@A5mod3us

@XVIindustries Just to be clear, I'm not saying you're wrong, just that my opinion differs ~_^

Ah well @A5mod3us

@XVIindustries Again, Semantics. As far as I see, whether it is in service or not, it's still a fighter. The only time that changes is if the air-frame is modified to serve another purpose, such as a P-51 being modified for racing, or a B-25 being modified for fire-bombing. Just because a fighter is no longer used in that role doesn't change what it was designed to do. A bus is still a bus, even if you don't haul people around in it. As I stated before, it's a matter of semantics.

Lol I believe that you should only say "is" when Dutch aircraft is still widespread and in service, derringer to it as a single seat fighter with the word "is" implies it is still a single seat fighter, saying it "was" a single seat fighter is correct because it once was, a fighter is only a fighter when it is in service, same with a bomber. in the end they all end up being civilian aircraft not operated by air forces. @A5mod3us

@XVIindustries *shrug* semantics.

It has expired, no longer In-Service @A5mod3us

@XVIindustries The plane still exists, so why should it be referred to in past tense?

wowowowowowowow

@XVIindustries also I painted it the best I could to match the D-day paint. What bumpers are you referring to?

@XVIindustries I just copied and pasted from Wikipedia but I made it to look like the Supermarine Spitfire Mk VIII

Exude me for being a grammar nazi but the first sentence "the spitfire is a British single-seat Fighter" is wrong, it should be: The Supermarine Spitfire Mk.(1-24 whatever MK this is) Was a British single-seat fighter. :)

What variant is this? Because I have not seen that wing configuration before, or that colour scheme, apart from those two bummers, the fuselage is very if not amazingly accurate :) keep it up!