Profile image

LTS T-75 / su-75 checkmate

51.7k Falkenwut  3.4 years ago

Name: LTS T-75 / Su-75 Checkmate
Type: Lazy Replica
Attempt #: 1
Falkenwut Generation Build: 5

So here's my LTS T-75 / SU-75 Checkmate, Russia's mockup concept for a new Multi-role lightweight stealth fighter design unveileved recently.

Special thanks goes to a user Noelaychan00 from Skipper's SimplePlanes Discord Server for the blueprints above

Thanks to @Zalyarowsky 's SU-75 for the idea of how to fix the nose intake shape

Special thanks to @asteroidbook345 for confirming the actual designation name for this specific model.

Trim - Trim
Flaps - Flaps

General Characteristics

  • Successors 1 airplane(s) +126 bonus
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 39.2ft (12.0m)
  • Length 58.6ft (17.9m)
  • Height 15.4ft (4.7m)
  • Empty Weight 31,785lbs (14,417kg)
  • Loaded Weight 37,878lbs (17,181kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 0.889
  • Wing Loading 56.0lbs/ft2 (273.5kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 676.1ft2 (62.8m2)
  • Drag Points 2379

Parts

  • Number of Parts 90
  • Control Surfaces 4
  • Performance Cost 548
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    14.0k Kiv

    It's E P I C

    +2 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    51.7k Falkenwut

    @LightningTreeSavor would be awesome, but no.

    it's Light Tactical Aircraft [Legkij Takticheskie Samolyet]

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Falkenwut is this plane named after me? LOL

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,837 HelloX

    Ur pfp says it all 😂 @asteroidbook345

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    51.7k Falkenwut

    @Xx24reminder Beats me... I'm presuming there's a reason, (ex. design number) but don't know... Interesting topic to research!!

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Falkenwut I meant,if that's what the prototype su-57 was named,why wouldn't the su-75 prototype be named in that order?

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    51.7k Falkenwut

    @Xx24reminder That would be the T-50 / SU-57 Felon, Not the T-75 / SU-75 Checkmate. 2 Different planes.

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    51.7k Falkenwut

    @MuizTheMobileFriendly It took me a while to see it but put a smile on my face as well :D

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    51.7k Falkenwut

    @Zalyarowsky It's a lazy build, just built it coz I could, didn't bother too much with details... Including the baydoor systems for that matter.

    For better dogfighting this plane would need fly-by-wire. Like many modern fighters, the planes are inherintly unstable and can only fly properly with fly-by-wire technology. Frankly, I have no idea how to implement in game...

    If you know how to fix the engine problem, please share! I couldn't find out why it does it!

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    Happy plane

    +2 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,805 Zalyarowsky

    @Haytham115, agreed

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,805 Zalyarowsky

    Needing better engine, he can't goodly flight at dogfights
    Engine hides to inside plane when thrust activated

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Falkenwut did they call the su-57 t-50 back then?

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    51.7k Falkenwut

    @Xx24reminder It's a T-75.. not T-70... shrugs

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    51.7k Falkenwut

    @Zalyarowsky As per description... No idea how the user got it though...

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    51.7k Falkenwut

    @Haytham115 Feel free to fix it as a successor :)

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    Doesn't quite look like the T-70

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,805 Zalyarowsky

    WHERE YOU FOUND BLUEPRINT

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    Bad for thrust vectoring please put a better engine

    +2 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    6,516 WingsOfSteel

    Very cool!

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    nice build

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Falkenwut np lol

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    51.7k Falkenwut

    @asteroidbook345 Confirmed and fixed, thanks!

    3.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Falkenwut As far as I know the VVS hasn't said the designation, people are just thinking it's Su-75 because it has a 75 on the side. That's not indicative of the designation, and likely either stands for T-75 or simply Idyelize 75, which wouldn't be a designation of the aircraft, but rather a designation of the design. It's like how the Su-57 was the T-50 pre-production

    +1 3.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    51.7k Falkenwut

    @asteroidbook345 I heard about the mis-designation. Could you please provide the proper designation and if there is any documentation saying so. Many news outlets have already stuck to the su-75 bandwagon apparently...

    3.4 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments