QB-109
79.8k Marine
6.0 years ago
Old jet airliner.
1:Gear light
2:Landing light
3:Airbrake
4:Gyro
8:Main power
VTOL:Flaps
Trim:Trim
Takeoff:VTOL half down and 90% power. 150mph to rotate.
Landing:VTOL full down and 18% power.
Have fun!
Specifications
Spotlights
- MrSilverWolf 6.0 years ago
General Characteristics
- Successors 1 airplane(s)
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 97.5ft (29.7m)
- Length 87.8ft (26.8m)
- Height 26.4ft (8.0m)
- Empty Weight 53,772lbs (24,391kg)
- Loaded Weight 53,772lbs (24,391kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 7.857
- Wing Loading 28.2lbs/ft2 (137.7kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,907.2ft2 (177.2m2)
- Drag Points 35517
Parts
- Number of Parts 584
- Control Surfaces 7
- Performance Cost 2,582
Were going "over the pacific"
Looks like dehavilland comet + convair 990
@DeSnakeslz
It does very much
This build is very impressive, it will inspire my next build for sure!
Looks like a soviet airliner
@QingyuZhou ok, will try reduce forward tractions
Well this beauty has a little flaw on the main gears. Low speed aerodynamics feels good, however the nose dropped too quickly right after touchdown. I'd say reduce rear wheels' forward tractions or brake torque.
@ChiChiWerx because sometimes autopilot gose mad
@Marine no problem!
@CptJacobson I’m pretty sure it would be fine in the US, I don’t see anything against glass noses
Well, flies nice, accelerates realistically, nice build. Why the gyro? If it’s to fly hands off, why not call it an autopilot? Also, will...not...run...out...of...fuel...!
@MrSilverWolf thx!
That’s Russia not America @MrSilverWolf
@CptJacobson how would it not pass safety checks? The Tu-134 was fine, it had a glass nose like this
Awesome!
@CptJacobson yep. I purposely did it
@CRJ900Pilot thanks:)
I'm getting some Tu-124 vibes.
Right @BurkeEnterprise
@CptJacobson tell that to the soviets
And actually this would never pass safety checks because of the glass nose cone
Oh well it looks like it
@CptJacobson
The comets way bigger @kbarnett2008
Totally not a de havilliand comet
cool!