[PEA] Vought V-173
69.8k Monarchii
7 months ago
Specifications
Spotlights
- WinsWings 7 months ago
General Characteristics
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 33.8ft (10.3m)
- Length 27.2ft (8.3m)
- Height 15.9ft (4.9m)
- Empty Weight 1,751lbs (794kg)
- Loaded Weight 2,269lbs (1,029kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 1.233
- Wing Loading 4.7lbs/ft2 (23.0kg/m2)
- Wing Area 481.0ft2 (44.7m2)
- Drag Points 4061
Parts
- Number of Parts 57
- Control Surfaces 4
- Performance Cost 328
@C47skytrain someday, I can't rn since my device tanked
@Monarchii could you make the Goodyear inflatableplane or the PO-2?
@LOGANP117andMAX ye
It's the flying pancake literally
@MonarchiiwithastolenMG ok, hope you get a new phone soon! Second hand phones and computers are good options
@MonarchiiwithastolenMG no problem - have fun
@AnotherRB it is actually like that lmao, stupid looking but hey, I mean it works(irl)
@zSmudge it the pain XD
@C47skytrain I probably will one day(*ahem* I want an AC-130 so a C-130 definitely should exist first) but as of now, I can't do anything, device problems to sum it up.
@Robomo119E definitely lmao
@WinsWings it's definitely fun to play around with but I for the life of me can't just seem to land it lmao; thanks for the spotlight!! ( >▽< )
Pain cake
the gear are actually like that no way
the front gear are sooooo long,and the tiny tail wheel, it'll just tear apart when landing lol
@MonarchiiwithastolenMG my final idea, could you please make a C-130? It would be very cool since there aren't any low part C-130's
I did not just spend a whole day trying to land this pancake
nice, you did it. this is one of my bucket list to build -
@LoneSpaceGaming yes
@C47skytrain
The low part one is pretty far out there, I take forever on my projects, not to mention I always work on multiple at once. If you’d like, I can get started on the low part version early.
@LoneSpaceGaming thank you!
@C47skytrain
I'm working on a realistic F4U-1D, but it'll be pretty detailed. If you're looking for a low part one, I plan on making that too as an AI version with way less parts.
@MobileBuilder21 thanks ( ^▽^ )
Good work
@zSmudge yep, it is very mobile friendly ( ^▽^ )
@C47skytrain for now, the PEA Project is officially on halt until further notice; like i said lol, engines in sp is weird in a way, i try to replicate the weight as close as i can but engines in SP is just... they just have too much acceleration, you dont notice it as much on slow aircrafts but for faster aircrafts, its a headache and kind of.. a weird experience? like as Ive mentioned before, i use the smooth function so the engine gradually spools up to speed, but the problem with that is that it goes both ways, spooling down takes time, and the longer you spools up, the longer you have to spool down and such, great example i have is my B-17 which, well, kek