WW2 Fighter Challenge - RUSH BUILD! (CLOSED)
Congratulations!
Here are the Winners:
1st place:
QAS-P-25-Shrike Great details, landing gear and mechanicals. weaponry, excellent cockpit details, also flies and handle very well
2nd Place:
Hawker-Tempest-F-6
Great details, landing gear and mechanicals. weaponry, excellent cockpit details,
it is also curated by SimplePlane
3rd Place:
R-2-2A-Rocksell
Most people overlook this plane. I saw it is an excellent handling and did a great job from water takeoff. It is not so easy to built a great flying and landing seaplane. Good cockpit details and really fun
These planes are also so good and I am upvoting them personally:
Please check them out as Honorable mentions -
Yak-7B
Excellent flying plane, and excellent fighter at dogfight
Denwald-Dw-101-D-3-Grusel
Excellent details, lovely cockpit, true colors, it is also curated by SimplePlane
Elfenhaven-Aerospace-El-35B-P-1035-Enzian
This is one of the best maneuvering plane is this challenge, Also I love the realistic proportion of it.
National-Model-1-Shenhe Nice looking plane, sadly it is hard to land without breaking its propellers.
Disclaimer:
I am very proud of your works, and please do not feel bad if your entry is not award winning, (my apology! I want to make you all fun, including myself) I do my best but it is very hard to judge as the entry are so special. Thank you all and see you in the next round. I am uprooting to each one of you
================ ======== ======== ======== ========
WW2 Fighter Challenge
You can use unlimited parts
So let us build a WW2 fighter with these constraints;
1) Limit to one propeller only, Like Zero, P51, Spitfire, etc.,
2) No heavy fighters (like P38, Mosquito, BF110, etc.,) Maybe next time...
3) No Jets, including WW2 era Jets and Rocket planes (No Me262 and Meteors), I recommend not to use the T3000 prop, which is a Turboprop. That was in production after the war.
4) No guided missiles, of course; unguided rockets are okay.
5) You can use an unlimited number of parts (as far as you finish in 2 weeks).
6) Fictional ones are welcome, as far as it looks and feels in the WW2 era.
7) Some bi-planes fighters of WW1 are also acceptable
8) Has to be a successor, so please download this and build.
Has to be a successor, so please download this and build.
Ends June 16th, 2022
9) You can use an unlimited number of parts (as far as you finish in 2 weeks).
I will judge by ...?
- How good does its fly
- Details and reality
- any interesting historical features?
- Point on the rear aircrafts
- no special modding, Just XML is fine.
Awards
10 upvotes + 1 spotlight
7 upvotes + 1 spotlight
5 upvotes + 1 spotlight
For Every decent entry…
Every reasonable entry will get 1 Upvote or a spotlight upfront -
or maybe I will follow you, and more
ALL POSTS MUST BE A SUCCESSOR
if there are not enough things to upvote, sorry!
Have Fun!
My simple build Nakajima-K39
Specifications
Spotlights
- WINGSIRONAVIATION 2.6 years ago
General Characteristics
- Successors 26 airplane(s) +1846 bonus
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 1.6ft (0.5m)
- Length 3.3ft (1.0m)
- Height 3.3ft (1.0m)
- Empty Weight 595lbs (270kg)
- Loaded Weight 595lbs (270kg)
Performance
- Wing Loading N/A
- Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
- Drag Points 385
Parts
- Number of Parts 3
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 7
I am upvoting and giving spotlight to winners as well as those with great builders! (Give me some time today)
Congratulations!
Here are the Winners:
1st place:
QAS-P-25-Shrike Great details, landing gear and mechanicals. weaponry, excellent cockpit details, also flies and handle very well
2nd Place:
Hawker-Tempest-F-6
Great details, landing gear and mechanicals. weaponry, excellent cockpit details,
it is also curated by SimplePlane
3rd Place:
R-2-2A-Rocksell
Most people overlook this plane. I saw it is an excellent handling and did a great job from water takeoff. It is not so easy to built a great flying and landing seaplane. Good cockpit details and really fun
These planes are also so good and I am upvoting them personally:
Please check them out as Honorable mentions -
Yak-7B
Excellent flying plane, and excellent fighter at dogfight
Denwald-Dw-101-D-3-Grusel
Excellent details, lovely cockpit, true colors, it is also curated by SimplePlane
Elfenhaven-Aerospace-El-35B-P-1035-Enzian
This is one of the best maneuvering plane is this challenge, Also I love the realistic proportion of it.
National-Model-1-Shenhe Nice looking plane, sadly it is hard to land without breaking its propellers.
@QuesoAirlines @mememanson @Yourlocalhuman @Sewander
@Dragoranos @TWDDerSharkmarine @AnOmalOcaris
Good job to everyone who participated!
@TWDDerSharkmarine My pleasure... I wish everyone happy and have fun, and learn form each others
Yes, of course, I will make one for Heavy fighters... @Yourlocalhuman
Sooo, will you upload another challenge about WW2 planes but allowing heavy fighter-bomber instead?
I feel honored to show up on the Honorable Mentions, it surprises me that the plane is one of the most maneuverable in this challenge, along with the fact that its realistically proportioned, both are unintentional, good challenge, 10/10 would do again
Thanks for joining! So we got 26 planes and i will look into every single plane and post the results and upvotes soon. (Maybe by Sunday) again, THANKS YOU ALL. 6/17/22
I may have waited to the last minute to publish mine 👀.
No worries, Good luck @SchadeAircaftCompany
I never making aircraft ww2 becaude im lazy, sry
Hope you don’t mind all my entries being carrier based, seems like I’m on a carrier kick recently
@WinsWings
Here
sent me the link @Dragoranos
My plane is ready, but it was not a successor, I called a moderator and he did not respond
@WinsWings great!
XML editing is allowed @JamTheProtogen
Are funky trees allowed?
I’m in.
Yes, go for it as far as one prop (like Ju87) @TRD6932
Are dive bombers allowed? I want to make the Yokosuka D4Y.
Yes, I will put on the longer challenge in the future @KingOfTypos
Noted. @MrKtheguy
@WinsWings By the way, the unlisted version of my RK-04 is a successor to your challenge, just to let you know if you didn’t.
@WinsWings my builds are kinda... Between Cheap/Simple and High Quality/complex rating so it takes a minimum of 1 week for 1 whole plane, and maybe even more so with a special function for the Defiant. So i think ill back off.