Profile image

WW2 Fighter Challenge - RUSH BUILD! (CLOSED)

302k WinsWings  2.5 years ago

Congratulations!

Here are the Winners:

1st place:

QAS-P-25-Shrike Great details, landing gear and mechanicals. weaponry, excellent cockpit details, also flies and handle very well

2nd Place:

Hawker-Tempest-F-6
Great details, landing gear and mechanicals. weaponry, excellent cockpit details,
it is also curated by SimplePlane

3rd Place:

R-2-2A-Rocksell
Most people overlook this plane. I saw it is an excellent handling and did a great job from water takeoff. It is not so easy to built a great flying and landing seaplane. Good cockpit details and really fun

These planes are also so good and I am upvoting them personally:

Please check them out as Honorable mentions -

Yak-7B
Excellent flying plane, and excellent fighter at dogfight

Denwald-Dw-101-D-3-Grusel
Excellent details, lovely cockpit, true colors, it is also curated by SimplePlane

Elfenhaven-Aerospace-El-35B-P-1035-Enzian
This is one of the best maneuvering plane is this challenge, Also I love the realistic proportion of it.

National-Model-1-Shenhe Nice looking plane, sadly it is hard to land without breaking its propellers.

Disclaimer:

I am very proud of your works, and please do not feel bad if your entry is not award winning, (my apology! I want to make you all fun, including myself) I do my best but it is very hard to judge as the entry are so special. Thank you all and see you in the next round. I am uprooting to each one of you

================ ======== ======== ======== ========

WW2 Fighter Challenge

You can use unlimited parts

So let us build a WW2 fighter with these constraints;

1) Limit to one propeller only, Like Zero, P51, Spitfire, etc.,
2) No heavy fighters (like P38, Mosquito, BF110, etc.,) Maybe next time...
3) No Jets, including WW2 era Jets and Rocket planes (No Me262 and Meteors), I recommend not to use the T3000 prop, which is a Turboprop. That was in production after the war.
4) No guided missiles, of course; unguided rockets are okay.
5) You can use an unlimited number of parts (as far as you finish in 2 weeks).
6) Fictional ones are welcome, as far as it looks and feels in the WW2 era.
7) Some bi-planes fighters of WW1 are also acceptable
8) Has to be a successor, so please download this and build.

Has to be a successor, so please download this and build.

Ends June 16th, 2022

9) You can use an unlimited number of parts (as far as you finish in 2 weeks).

I will judge by ...?

  1. How good does its fly
  2. Details and reality
  3. any interesting historical features?
  4. Point on the rear aircrafts
  5. no special modding, Just XML is fine.

Awards

10 upvotes + 1 spotlight
7 upvotes + 1 spotlight
5 upvotes + 1 spotlight

For Every decent entry…

Every reasonable entry will get 1 Upvote or a spotlight upfront -
or maybe I will follow you, and more
ALL POSTS MUST BE A SUCCESSOR
if there are not enough things to upvote, sorry!

Have Fun!


My simple build Nakajima-K39

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 26 airplane(s) +1846 bonus
  • Created On iOS
  • Wingspan 1.6ft (0.5m)
  • Length 3.3ft (1.0m)
  • Height 3.3ft (1.0m)
  • Empty Weight 595lbs (270kg)
  • Loaded Weight 595lbs (270kg)

Performance

  • Wing Loading N/A
  • Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
  • Drag Points 385

Parts

  • Number of Parts 3
  • Control Surfaces 0
  • Performance Cost 7
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    302k WinsWings

    I am upvoting and giving spotlight to winners as well as those with great builders! (Give me some time today)

    Pinned 2.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    302k WinsWings

    Congratulations!

    Here are the Winners:

    1st place:

    QAS-P-25-Shrike Great details, landing gear and mechanicals. weaponry, excellent cockpit details, also flies and handle very well

    2nd Place:

    Hawker-Tempest-F-6
    Great details, landing gear and mechanicals. weaponry, excellent cockpit details,
    it is also curated by SimplePlane

    3rd Place:

    R-2-2A-Rocksell
    Most people overlook this plane. I saw it is an excellent handling and did a great job from water takeoff. It is not so easy to built a great flying and landing seaplane. Good cockpit details and really fun

    These planes are also so good and I am upvoting them personally:
    Please check them out as Honorable mentions -

    Yak-7B
    Excellent flying plane, and excellent fighter at dogfight

    Denwald-Dw-101-D-3-Grusel
    Excellent details, lovely cockpit, true colors, it is also curated by SimplePlane

    Elfenhaven-Aerospace-El-35B-P-1035-Enzian
    This is one of the best maneuvering plane is this challenge, Also I love the realistic proportion of it.

    National-Model-1-Shenhe Nice looking plane, sadly it is hard to land without breaking its propellers.

    @QuesoAirlines @mememanson @Yourlocalhuman @Sewander
    @Dragoranos @TWDDerSharkmarine @AnOmalOcaris

    Pinned 2.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,012 MrKtheguy

    Good job to everyone who participated!

    +1 2.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    302k WinsWings

    @TWDDerSharkmarine My pleasure... I wish everyone happy and have fun, and learn form each others

    2.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    302k WinsWings

    Yes, of course, I will make one for Heavy fighters... @Yourlocalhuman

    2.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    Sooo, will you upload another challenge about WW2 planes but allowing heavy fighter-bomber instead?

    +1 2.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    I feel honored to show up on the Honorable Mentions, it surprises me that the plane is one of the most maneuverable in this challenge, along with the fact that its realistically proportioned, both are unintentional, good challenge, 10/10 would do again

    +1 2.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    302k WinsWings

    Thanks for joining! So we got 26 planes and i will look into every single plane and post the results and upvotes soon. (Maybe by Sunday) again, THANKS YOU ALL. 6/17/22

    2.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    I may have waited to the last minute to publish mine 👀.

    +1 2.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    302k WinsWings

    No worries, Good luck @SchadeAircaftCompany

    2.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    14.0k Kiv

    I never making aircraft ww2 becaude im lazy, sry

    +1 2.4 years ago
  • Profile image

    Hope you don’t mind all my entries being carrier based, seems like I’m on a carrier kick recently

    +1 2.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    27.8k Dragoranos

    @WinsWings
    Here

    +1 2.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    302k WinsWings

    sent me the link @Dragoranos

    2.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    27.8k Dragoranos

    My plane is ready, but it was not a successor, I called a moderator and he did not respond

    2.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,325 ThatOneFurry

    @WinsWings great!

    2.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    302k WinsWings

    XML editing is allowed @JamTheProtogen

    2.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,325 ThatOneFurry

    Are funky trees allowed?

    +1 2.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    4,353 Hannyboy

    I’m in.

    +1 2.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    302k WinsWings

    Yes, go for it as far as one prop (like Ju87) @TRD6932

    +1 2.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,326 TRD6932

    Are dive bombers allowed? I want to make the Yokosuka D4Y.

    +1 2.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    302k WinsWings

    Yes, I will put on the longer challenge in the future @KingOfTypos

    2.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    302k WinsWings

    Noted. @MrKtheguy

    2.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    9,012 MrKtheguy

    @WinsWings By the way, the unlisted version of my RK-04 is a successor to your challenge, just to let you know if you didn’t.

    +1 2.5 years ago
  • Profile image
    26.5k KingOfTypos

    @WinsWings my builds are kinda... Between Cheap/Simple and High Quality/complex rating so it takes a minimum of 1 week for 1 whole plane, and maybe even more so with a special function for the Defiant. So i think ill back off.

    2.5 years ago
  • Log in to see more comments