NS Argo
This would probably be the largest bulk carrier ever built and the second largest ship after the Seawise Giant/Happy Giant/Jahre Viking/Knock Nevis/Mont if my other bulk carriers aren't involved.
VTOL slider controls the propeller pitch. Up=reverse down=forward. 1/2 up/down for best effect.
Trim slider to control rudder.
Argo, Not the Soviet union Bulk carrier laid down 1978
Displacement:
519,752 t light; 530,359 t standard; 530,359 t normal; 530,359 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
1,463.26 ft / 1,463.26 ft x 221.46 ft x 65.62 ft (normal load)
446.00 m / 446.00 m x 67.50 m x 20.00 m
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 16.0" / 406 mm 1,097.44 ft / 334.50 m 17.86 ft / 5.44 m
Ends: 8.00" / 203 mm 365.79 ft / 111.49 m 17.86 ft / 5.44 m
Upper: 7.50" / 191 mm 1,097.44 ft / 334.50 m 8.00 ft / 2.44 m
Main Belt covers 115 % of normal length
Torpedo Bulkhead:
8.00" / 203 mm 1,097.44 ft / 334.50 m 65.21 ft / 19.88 mArmour deck: 5.00" / 127 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Electric motors, 1 shaft, 74,875 shp / 55,856 Kw = 16.01 kts
Range Unlimited
Complement:
25 - 74
Cost:
£576.734 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Armour: 67,597 tons, 12.7 %
- Belts: 18,201 tons, 3.4 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 21,183 tons, 4.0 %
- Armament: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Armour Deck: 28,213 tons, 5.3 %
- Conning Tower: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Machinery: 1,791 tons, 0.3 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 450,363 tons, 84.9 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 10,607 tons, 2.0 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
15,192,920 lbs / 6,891,392 Kg = 140,675.2 x 6 " / 152 mm shells or 87,101.0 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.71
Metacentric height 39.9 ft / 12.2 m
Roll period: 14.7 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 49 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.00
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 0.97
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck
Block coefficient: 0.873
Length to Beam Ratio: 6.61 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 38.25 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 17 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 0.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 32.81 ft / 10.00 m
- Forecastle (10 %): 24.61 ft / 7.50 m
- Mid (50 %): 24.61 ft / 7.50 m
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 24.61 ft / 7.50 m
- Stern: 24.61 ft / 7.50 m
- Average freeboard: 24.93 ft / 7.60 m
Ship tends to be wet forward
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 3.5 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 145.5 %
Waterplane Area: 305,005 Square feet or 28,336 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 745 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 1,224 lbs/sq ft or 5,977 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 5.19
- Longitudinal: 2.73
- Overall: 3.21
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Poor seaboat, wet and uncomfortable, reduced performance in heavy weather
Ignore the armour statistics unless you are hauling cork and other buoyant materials. But even when you are not, its nearly unsinkable.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 221.9ft (67.6m)
- Length 1463.2ft (446.0m)
- Height 246.3ft (75.1m)
- Empty Weight N/A
- Loaded Weight N/A
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.029
- Wing Loading 25.1lbs/ft2 (122.4kg/m2)
- Wing Area 4,121,490.1ft2 (382,899.3m2)
- Drag Points 1715961
Parts
- Number of Parts 666
- Control Surfaces 20
- Performance Cost 2,231
666 Parts...?.....i
you need the freecam mod to go around it XD
oh my goodness that thing is massive XD
@Feanor please do not add or remove a single part that is my favorite number
@Kerbango if you click your 666 it takes you to mark of the beast for some reason
666 again.
Space battleship argo
@AnelGaming first off 666 is the number of the Beast.
Second 666 is a repidigit.
@AnelGaming You might very think that, but I couldn't possibly comment.
ILLUMINATI COMFIRMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@randomusername But if the cost of a naval nuclear reactor is excluded, two of these ships could be build and they would still cost less money than a B-2 when in service.