The Beechcraft T-6 Texan II is a single-engine turboprop aircraft built by the Raytheon Aircraft Company (which became Hawker Beechcraft and is now Beechcraft Corporation). Based on the Pilatus PC-9, the T-6 has replaced the Air Force's Cessna T-37B Tweet and the Navy's T-34C Turbo Mentor. The T-6A is used by the United States Air Force for basic pilot training and Combat Systems Officer (CSO) training and by the United States Navy and United States Marine Corps for Primary and Intermediate Naval Flight Officer (NFO) training.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 32.1ft (9.8m)
- Length 28.1ft (8.6m)
- Height 11.4ft (3.5m)
- Empty Weight 6,635lbs (3,010kg)
- Loaded Weight 7,502lbs (3,402kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.399
- Wing Loading 43.4lbs/ft2 (211.9kg/m2)
- Wing Area 172.8ft2 (16.1m2)
- Drag Points 2661
Parts
- Number of Parts 50
- Control Surfaces 5
- Performance Cost 317
@Polandball if the user makes another account after being banned and continues to break rules, then they get an IP ban which means they cannot make an account with that IP address.
@Polandball you've got no notes on you, so yeah, you're as good as gold! XD
@Polandball they help us keep track of who's done what. Because the site operates on a three strike system, but we obviously can't keep track of every user, so we have moderator notes.
@TrashFam No problem. Next time there's an issue though, contact a moderator. This could have gone a lot worse!
Thank you very much sir. @Squirrel
@TrashFam Mod notes have been removed.
@ccooper I've removed his comment from your post. However, as stated before I agree that the language used was wrong, but it again was a reaction to a situation you caused.
Tell you what, if you accept responsibility for the fact that you caused this situation, then I'll remove the Moderator notes from both of you.
@ccooper What do you disagree with?
@ccooper While I don't agree with the language used in that post, it was a DIRECT response to YOU falsely accusing this user of copying your aircraft, despite the fact they only just barely look alike. It was a situation that you yourself caused, so while the language may be upsetting to you, you have no grounds to complain since you got this post removed, which triggered this situation.
.
Had you actually taken the time to appreciate what this user has done (and perhaps got a few points for it) instead of reporting this aircraft, this whole situation could have been avoided. Like I say, the language used from @TrashFam is far from acceptable, but given the circumstances, I can't say I 100% blame him/her for their reactions. As a result of this, you will both get moderator notes put on your profile to make them aware of your history.
@ccooper what? I fail to see anything here that comes under NSFW
@ccooper what about this aircraft makes you consider it a copy or worthy of being banned? Literally everything on if has changed appart from maybe the nose section. Please download it, fly it and tell me why this is a copy.
@TrashFam Apologies for the inconvenience. Hopefully it won't happen again.
@ccooper This isn't a direct copy. Obviously it's a successor, but every specification is completely different to the predecessor. Also, the blueprint shown next to the specifications shows a clear difference in appearance.
@ccooper it's not even the same plane man, I only used your fuselage as the base for the aircraft. Everything is changed, look for yourself
It's not exactly your aircraft no ? It's just based on it no ? @ccooper