Manual Anti-Air Challenge Entry
21.1k LieutenantSOT
4.1 years ago
This anti-aircraft cannon was made to get the job done, with simplicity in mind. It has 2 400 hp engines and a nice camera placement
Controls:
AG1 is for the Cannon and Minigun, as well as unlocking the rotators.
AG2 is for the engines
AG3 is for the rockets.
I hope you enjoy! This is my challenge entry. Roll and Pitch for the turret after AG1 is activated
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Successors 1 airplane(s) +10 bonus
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 7.6ft (2.3m)
- Length 20.3ft (6.2m)
- Height 7.3ft (2.2m)
- Empty Weight 2,802lbs (1,271kg)
- Loaded Weight 3,068lbs (1,391kg)
Performance
- Wing Loading 439,839.3lbs/ft2 (2,147,483.6kg/m2)
- Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
- Drag Points 3670
Parts
- Number of Parts 72
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 317
@NormalPioneer yea but the attention to detail is very high. I got the spent shells, I got working cranks, I got accurate gun shapes, and it looks like a real bofors, so I dont get where I go wrong on that end
@LieutenantSOT all right. cant wait!
@LieutenantSOT this, however, I did completely through my phone, so it doesn't have a good description... but I can fix that quickly
@PapaKernels okay, cool! Will do. I usually upload via my phone, and then I type the description through my laptop. But I think I need to start doing it as a private before uploading to public. Thanks for the tips! And I will tag you when I am done
@LieutenantSOT tag me when your done I would much like to see it.
@LieutenantSOT np. I know that on android I cant hit enter when I'm making the description in-game so I make it a private so I can edit the description without it being out. It helps alot as you dont have a rush to post it.
@PapaKernels aww, thank you! I know how to XML mod, Right now I'm trying to learn more about custom wings and landing gear. I am working on a 300 part version of one of my older posts (THA-X5 Sparrow)
@LieutenantSOT I wanted the thing you use to be red but it didn't work.
@LieutenantSOT ah, ha! I did it. Thanks @PapaKernels!
Wow you improved alot! Some of those planes look really good. Do you know how to XML mod? I think the cockpits on some of them look to small for the size of the aircraft.
hello
```hello?
'''hello
hello
Hello
3 hello
@LieutenantSOT wait it should have made them big. Oh well you get what I'm saying.
@LieutenantSOT to do large thex use the number sign # from 1 to 5 with 1 the bigest and 5 the smallest. To do red text use this ``` it should work.
1 number sign
2
3
4
5
@LieutenantSOT oh, I can also do
@PapaKernels I completely get where you are coming from! You're fine. In the last 17 days I have become a much better builder, and I could make something much, much better than this.
I know how to do this this and this but I don't know how to do large text. Thank you, though!
@LieutenantSOT like no offense but this is basic compared to mine. I spent so much time perfecting the cranks the aim redicals and the small details its honestly a bit more aesthetically pleasing than this ( again no offense, I dont want to knock a build you spent some time on) and I made my description a bit cleaner than yours. If you want to know how I made mine I can tell you how to get the bigger text and stuff.
@PapaKernels sorry that this happened, I hope it gets fixed. It's no one's fault, though. I suppose that with the part count deduction it is much lower
Because I'm 78 parts under the limit, it should be a 40 overall. I'm just trying to be fair because I could have (and definitely now) put more effort into this build. I'm glad you liked it, but under the same circumstances it isn't fair to Kernels (no offense to your grade, I appreciate the high score :)
@NormalPioneer I'm a bit confused, my build is almost double the part count, and is better detailed and this gets a better score than mine? If it shakes then it should deduct points and for the under part count minimum. Yes mine is a bit hard to control but once you get the hang of it its pretty easy. This is not fair.
Why did @toxicshadowxt get a bad score because of part count but this didn't @NormalPioneer