Profile image

sempson s1 ww1 bomber

60.4k PapaKernels  4.1 years ago
Auto Credit Based on JakeS's [WINNERS PICKED!] WWI Challenge

this is the sempson s1 bomber for the ww1 challenge

history

The sempson s1 is a ww1 era bomber that saw little to no active combat service, but was regarded as a technological hero for the allied war effort. The bomber was one of the first bombers designed and used during the first world war of this scale. Its 6 engines get this to a speed of around 240mph. Its success was short lived when it went for its first test flights and showed how nose heavy it was, and how in bearable for the pilots to handle and suffered many crashes. It though was still used in combat, it was thought of as to important and advanced that it was worth the likelihood of crashes. In terms of defense, this aircraft was armed with 1 rifle that the bombardier operated out the back. As you may imagine it was hard to use as it had no holder, the bombardier had to hold it, meaning it was not effective against attacks and often was shot down. The plane was only produced from early 1918 to the end of 1919, with only 1,000 being produced. Its relatively short production run, and very mild success in combat, made this one of the worst bombers produced during ww1. Through its 5 years of active service, only 200 planes survived, many in landing accidents and being shot down by enemy fighters and personnel.

engine

6 bve-mk2-ma1 engines producing 250hp each for 1500 total horsepower

controls

Normal flight controls
Ag1 to drop bombs ( from outside edge to the fuselage it goes from a 0 second delay to a 5 second delay)

fetures

12 250lbs bombs
A moderate interior ( seats and control stick)
(I was thinking of making the exhaust pipes have "exhaust" but for some reason my potato was starting to lag out sometimes, especially during takeoff and when I fast forwarded. It might be because of the engines but I don't know. And yes I decreased drag alot ( last I checked it was near 4000, compared to the near 30,000 it was at before and that was just with the basic fuselage and wings)

gallery

Sorry no gallery this time

thanks to those who upvote, comment, and follow

papakernels 11/25/2020

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor [WINNERS PICKED!] WWI Challenge
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 82.0ft (25.0m)
  • Length 54.7ft (16.7m)
  • Height 15.7ft (4.8m)
  • Empty Weight 17,535lbs (7,953kg)
  • Loaded Weight 19,421lbs (8,809kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.077
  • Wing Loading 20.2lbs/ft2 (98.6kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 961.3ft2 (89.3m2)
  • Drag Points 4234

Parts

  • Number of Parts 154
  • Control Surfaces 5
  • Performance Cost 886
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    60.4k PapaKernels

    @LieutenantSOT thanks buddy!

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    And here ya go, m8. 20k

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image

    Really cool!!!

    3.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    60.4k PapaKernels

    @MrShenanigans cool!

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    Cool plane im actually making one right now its a fictional and its a german bomber its still a work in progress tho

    3.9 years ago
  • Profile image
    60.4k PapaKernels

    @Jaspy109 I tried to do it but it said it was put in wrong or something.

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    60.4k PapaKernels

    @Jaspy109 I've been busy, I have alot on my mind as I may have covid so I haven't really been on the socials as muxh

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    60.4k PapaKernels

    @Jaspy109 the others were way better than this, details were better, and overall were a better build quality. I think it was fair.

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    15.5k Kangy

    Upvote 12

    4.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    60.4k PapaKernels

    @rexrexThezion why, because.........( hope you get the reference)

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    44.4k rexzion

    @PapaKernels why do you label it as one of the worst bombers of WW1 then?

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    60.4k PapaKernels

    @rexrexThezion that's why it's so technologically advanced.

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    44.4k rexzion

    @ACEPILOT109 this doesn't fly at all like a WW1 bomber lol

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    60.4k PapaKernels

    @ACEPILOT109 thanks man.

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    @PapaKernels
    she flys the way she looks (thats a good thing) so its heavy, sluggish, and flys badly, but thats how it is supposed to fly so its good!

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    60.4k PapaKernels

    @KnightOfRen thonks!:D

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    41.8k Ren

    Cool!

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    60.4k PapaKernels

    @rexrexThezion that's why it's so technologically advanced

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    44.4k rexzion

    it also flies hilariously fast.. I mean it could even be a WW2 fighter with it's unrealistic flight characteristics

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    44.4k rexzion

    12x 250lbs for WW1....

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    60.4k PapaKernels

    @acepilot109 thanks for the updoot! What do you think of her? I know she dont fly the best.

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    60.4k PapaKernels

    @JakeJakeTheSnake just realized I wanted to make the main fuselage "ssmmootthh" but I completely forgot about it. Oh well.

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,997 JakeS

    @PapaKernels nice! I love it!

    4.1 years ago
  • Profile image
    60.4k PapaKernels

    @JakeJakeTheSnake this is my entry. Hope you like it! :D

    4.1 years ago