Here at Scimitar Avitation, we strive to provide the best private propeller aircraft possible. Scimitar aircraft are distinguished by the shiny bottom, top color relating to the nickname, and scimitar style propellers.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Successors 1 airplane(s)
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 41.0ft (12.5m)
- Length 45.9ft (14.0m)
- Height 16.4ft (5.0m)
- Empty Weight N/A
- Loaded Weight 9,946lbs (4,511kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.301
- Wing Loading 33.0lbs/ft2 (161.3kg/m2)
- Wing Area 301.0ft2 (28.0m2)
- Drag Points 7124
Parts
- Number of Parts 132
- Control Surfaces 5
- Performance Cost 478
Nice plane
@Fjorge
Also here is a fun little stunt plane I just uploaded based on the the P1 Eagle:
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/7GScky/PAC-P1A-Upside-Down-Lander-Mod
@Fjorge
The P1 Series served both civilian and military. Because of it's excellent handling, and speed (despite somewhat low HP engine), it was manufactured as a fighter from 1918 to 1930. The P1C, was produced as a fighter all the way until 1940. It stopped their because it became outclassed by the bigger, better, faster fighters such as the Spitfire, P-51, Zero, BF109, etc.. The P1 was my fictional nation's first domestically produced aircart as well, so the fighter served in my fictional nation's air force and navy as well.
@JohnnyBoythePilot you can't arm it... thats not how it works! Boeing doesn't ma-- oh
@Fjorge
Ah ok. Interesting naming convention. We name our planes numerically, starting with our first model, the P1 Eagle, hence why it was assigned as 1. Also I kinda figured the joke was towards the tail, cause the airplane is very aerodynamic, and the prop on it probably makes it really fuel efficient.
Also, my latest upload: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/AeResK/PAC-P1C-Eagle-Armed
@JohnnyBoythePilot It doesnt use too much fuel
@JohnnyBoythePilot joke because of fat tail
@JohnnyBoythePilot and the S- is just the amount of parts
@Fjorge
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/5855m1/Scimitar-AviationS-80-Green
Yes I agree the S-80 "green" looks much better.
And by eating too much you mean it's a fuel guzzler or its a joke cause of its fat tail?
@JohnnyBoythePilot Stop with the fat tail this isn't even the latest version oh and this plane eats too much
@Fjorge
We'll see about that! I actually already have the blueprints for all my PAC planes, but my P1 Eagle 20's era bi-plane was PAC's first airplane and my first real design. I already finished the P1 Eagle series and gonna start building the P2 series here shortly. Currently your aircraft have the lead, but that'll change soon! 😤
Thought I gotta admit, everything front of the main wing on the S-132 does look pretty sexy. But why the fat tail?
@JohnnyBoythePilot You will go out of business in a month! We are constantly improving both the looks, and the flight!
@JohnnyBoythePilot >:)
Looks like Pavelenian Aircraft Company (Professional know as PAC) has some competition in the general aviation market. 😉
@spefyjerbf Thanks M8! I say that if a good builder upvotes your stuff, then it is good... lol
@FlyingThings Lol
@EternalDarkness Oh and thanks for calling it cute :3
Hey little buddy wanna play?
Ahhhh, it bit me.
@Fjorge tail is still fat and too long. Other than that, it's a cute little plane
No problemo
@Fjorge
@helilover03 @kgv23 @MrVaultech Thanks!
@EternalDarkness Oh yeah this will be the only series with detail... am I getting better at all? and what am I doing wrong here?