Profile image

Cessna 172 Floatplane

26.3k BRuthless  8.4 years ago

Yo dawg, we heard you like water, so we put some floats on your plane, so you can...FLY A FLOATPLANE!

Based on my 172RG, which is an overhauled version of BaconAircrafts' 172RG with a higher level of detail and realism.

Don't expect it to be fast, it's a cruiser that goes ~200 MPH at max like the real one. When you are travelling between islands, turn on the autopilot, make yourself a nice (Bacon-) sandwich and lean back! :)

Take-off should be done at ~100 MPH, rather a bit faster for the landing (~130 MPH on final approach, slowly dropping down to 90 MPH).
In the water you should put the flaps fully down and when you go over 60 MPH, pitch up a bit.

As Bacon's description still holds true and controls didn't change, I'll just copy it and add the things that are new:

CONTROLS:
VTOL: Flaps
TRIM: Trim
GEAR: Gear
CAM:1 Pilot POV
CAM2: Co-Pilot POV
ACTION GROUP 1: Landing lights
& normal contols.

FEATURES:
- Fully furnished cockpit
- Working artificial horizon (it's on free spin and can get out of alignment very quickly, tries to make it better have failed)
- Navigation system (input set to yaw)
- Fully working yokes that react to pitch and roll
- Fully working pedals that react to yaw and brake
- Realistic floats with retractable landing gear
- Working throttle

--> The second colour in the paint menu dictates the outline color (blue) feel free to change it to your favourite!

CREDITS:
Landing gear hinge: @FrankieB
Indicator lights: @Flightsonic

DESCRIPTION: Cessna introduced a retractable landing gear version of the 172 in 1980 and named it the Cutlass 172RG.

The Cutlass featured a variable-pitch, constant-speed propeller and a more powerful Lycoming O-360-F1A6 engine of 180 horsepower (130 kW). The 172RG sold for about US$19,000 more than the standard 172 of the same year and produced an optimal cruise speed of 140 knots (260 km/h), compared to 122 knots (226 km/h) for the contemporary 160 horsepower (120 kW) version.[15]

The 172RG did not find wide acceptance in the personal aircraft market because of higher initial and operating costs accompanied by mediocre cruising speed, but was adopted by many flight schools since it met the specific requirements for "complex aircraft" experience necessary to obtain a Commercial Pilot certificate (the role for which it was intended), at relatively low cost. Between 1980 and 1984 1177 RGs were built, with a small number following before production ceased in 1985.[citation needed]

While numbered and marketed as a 172, the 172RG was actually certified on the Cessna 175 type certificate.

Feedback and suggestions are appreciated.
Cheers! :)

General Characteristics

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.058
  • Wing Loading 17.0lbs/ft2 (83.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1,007.4ft2 (93.6m2)
  • Drag Points 13554

Parts

  • Number of Parts 292
  • Control Surfaces 14
  • Performance Cost 1,320
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    26.3k BRuthless

    @JMaxGamer11 Thanks for the nice words! I'm glad you and your viewers like it :)

    6.9 years ago
  • Profile image

    First I want to say great plane man. I know it’s not directly yours but I’m going to give you credit. Second I want to say I made a 17 min YT video of this and my fans loved it so I also want to thank you for that. And last but not least I want to say that the cockpit is impeccable,outstanding,amazing,awesome, and just all around cool. Thanks for making this.

    7.1 years ago
  • Profile image

    the autopilot loves this plane

    7.2 years ago
  • Profile image
    26.3k BRuthless

    @JakeTheDogg First I'll make a Piper PA-34 Seneca II on my own. Probably without a window block and just open windows instead.

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    26.3k BRuthless

    @CaesiciusPlanes Thanks, I forgot to change that bit in the desc. :D Fixed now.

    8.4 years ago
  • Profile image
    3,690 LjSpike

    It is a Beautifal set of pontoons you've added.

    8.4 years ago