Profile image

B-29 Superfortress

2,357 STT1  7.0 years ago

Here it is, the Boeing B-29 Superfortress, finally finished. The cockpit was probably the hardest part. Overall it's not the best, but it still looks alright and flies decently. The tail gear is more there for stability than anything else, the bottom-rear turret would scrape the ground on takeoff without it. I'm pretty sure it's not very accurate to the real thing, but it's needed if you don't want to scrape up your tail. AG 1 and VTOL down to open the bomb-bay doors. AG 2-6 activate the turrets, be carful with them (they can easily shoot your own plane). Each camera goes with a turret. It carries 16 Boom 25s and 4 Boom 50s.

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Successors 1 airplane(s)
  • Created On Mac
  • Wingspan 100.2ft (30.5m)
  • Length 72.8ft (22.2m)
  • Height 21.5ft (6.6m)
  • Empty Weight 21,613lbs (9,803kg)
  • Loaded Weight 30,808lbs (13,974kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.259
  • Wing Loading 19.7lbs/ft2 (96.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 1,566.0ft2 (145.5m2)
  • Drag Points 10822

Parts

  • Number of Parts 201
  • Control Surfaces 7
  • Performance Cost 1,272
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    2,773 fishheads88

    I like the silver

    +1 7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    19.7k WaffleCakes

    Probably the most advanced bomber during WW2.

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,357 STT1

    @Blue0Bull thank you very much!

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,842 Irobert55

    @Blue0Bull i know that the engine failures are more or less brought on by the fact that the engines were developed for use in war and were for this reason not perfectet. but after the war the planes start to transport a cargo far more destructible than bombs: tourists. and what want a tourist? think for your self. oh and by the way the boeing b 747 is the deadliest bomber becauses of tourism is a joke about idiots that can be made with every passenger plane.

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image

    @STT1 for his time it was a good plane

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    2,357 STT1

    @Irobert55 in what way? it seems to be one of their best (at least for when it was created) do to it having multiple parts that were more or less revolutionary for aircraft of the time, some of those things being that it was the first plane with a pressurized cabin as well as being one of the first to use some form of a computer/remote-control system for its turrets. Yes it had problems, but when working with all that technology that was new at the time you can't really blame it for those problems. However, I respect your opinion that it was an unsuccessful and/or poorly made aircraft and hope not to start an argument.

    7.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    1,842 Irobert55

    boeings most crappy plane.

    7.0 years ago