No Tags
If you like this plane, try the Mark III edition now available to download - An improved version. Much faster roll and pitch, and wing strength improved credit to thomasjaf's wing strut design. Enjoy, and please rate.
Please note: There is a flaw in this design, I suggest removing the fuel from the small wings to the rear of the plane to improve stability, or better yet, download the Mark III.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Successors 1 airplane(s) +7 bonus
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 30.9ft (9.4m)
- Length 36.8ft (11.2m)
- Height 6.6ft (2.0m)
- Empty Weight 9,724lbs (4,411kg)
- Loaded Weight 20,167lbs (9,147kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.838
- Wing Loading 19.1lbs/ft2 (93.5kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,053.4ft2 (97.9m2)
- Drag Points 2922
Parts
- Number of Parts 68
- Control Surfaces 8
- Performance Cost 317
- Log in to leave a comment
-
0 SimplePlanesGrandfatherThis rating has been grandfathered in from the old rating system.10.0 years ago
-
0 SimplePlanesGrandfatherThis rating has been grandfathered in from the old rating system.10.0 years ago
-
72.5k AuthrosHi eyv, thanks for the review. I noticed after I posted the mark 2 that I had the com too close to the col, taking away the fuel from the furthest wing parts to the back of the plane should irradiate most of the issue. I also know that due to the design, it does lose a lot of movability at high elevation, I assume this is something to do with the cot being too close to the centre. The struts are a design that thomasjaf's discovered. The wings are much less likely to fall off under pressure. The design has been proven on a 4000mph plane and they were intact after a hard maneuver.10.0 years ago
-
16 eyvAuthros, why are the forward control surfaces connected by detachers? Curious for later use in my own designs... This model is prone to flat spins, by the way. Nonetheless, absolutely awesome!10.0 years ago
