Profile image

Afterburner Challenge

45 ItsTSL  2.7 years ago
Auto Credit Based on TRD6932's (CLOSED) Afterburner Challenge

A little twist on the traditional Wasp for the Afterburner Challenge of TRD6932. Throttle above 90% for afterburner. Have fun :)

Spotlights

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor (CLOSED) Afterburner Challenge
  • Created On Android
  • Wingspan 39.6ft (12.1m)
  • Length 56.1ft (17.1m)
  • Height 15.6ft (4.8m)
  • Empty Weight 32,579lbs (14,777kg)
  • Loaded Weight 49,345lbs (22,382kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 1.776
  • Wing Loading 102.5lbs/ft2 (500.6kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 481.3ft2 (44.7m2)
  • Drag Points 5350

Parts

  • Number of Parts 238
  • Control Surfaces 10
  • Performance Cost 1,401
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    45 ItsTSL

    @TRD6932
    VFX
    I will try one more time to try and make a bigger and denser flame

    SFX
    It looks like I am good at my job as a sound engineer lol

    FUEL CONSUMPTION
    I tried to lower it as much as I could but I tried to make it realistic. Now I will try and lower it even more.

    FOOTNOTE
    I am really grateful for the criticism because it is the main way for me to get better at building. I will add another version for you to test, even aside from the challenge, as soon as I can and I am sorry for the long lag of the reply, I am just moving in another house. Thank you very much for the time you invested in my build.

    +1 2.6 years ago
  • Profile image
    5,341 TRD6932

    Ratings:

    VFX - 4/10

    Sorry, but there's not a lot of flame tbh. Could've had more work on it, could've been better. The Mach diamonds were kind of cool, maybe cooler if accompanied by a bigger flame.

    SFX - 7/10

    Generic sound, but it captures the feeling of engaging the afterburner. And of course, it fades out when you disengage it. Could've been better, but you definitely did great on this.

    Fuel Consumption - 3/10

    I am really sorry for this, but it consumes a lot of fuel on dry throttle like there's no tomorrow. Consumes EVEN more on wet throttle.

    Overall conclusion:

    Bland afterburner, decent sound effect, horrible fuel consumption rate, could've done more work but you get a 14/30.

    Footnote:

    I think you really did a decent job on this, but honestly it doesn't hold up to the feeling. I hope you take this as criticism to be able to improve, not an insult to degrade your efforts. You could do one more submission, give it another shot and improve this afterburner! I allow 2 entries per player.

    2.7 years ago