Northrop X-4 Bantam
During WWII, semi-tailless aircraft were studied by engineers in the U. S. and UK after the Luftwaffe deployed the Me-163. Post-war, Northrop built and tested the X-4 to assess its performance at near-supersonic speeds. The NACA took over the X-4 program from Northrop in 1950. High-speed instability led to the conclusion that semi-tailless aircraft were unsuitable for transonic flight. The X-4 on now display in the National Museum of the USAF in Dayton OH (which I’ve been to many times).
- AG3: wing lights
- AG5: Steering wheel engagement
- AG6: GYRO
- AG7: Chute
Takeoff should be achieved at 50% throttle. But rudder left slightly to keep you on course. You can use the gyroscope to help you takeoff and land.
General characteristics
* Crew: 1
* Length: 23 ft 3 in (7.09 m)
* Wingspan: 26 ft 10 in (8.18 m)
* Height: 14 ft 10 in (4.52 m)
* Wing area: 200 sq ft (19 m2)
* Airfoil: NACA 0010-64
* Empty weight: 5,507 lb (2,498 kg)
* Max takeoff weight: 7,820 lb (3,547 kg)
* Powerplant: 2 × Westinghouse J30-WE-7 / WE-9 turbojet engines 1,600 lbf (7.1 kN) thrust each
Performance
* Maximum speed: 625 mph (1,006 km/h, 543 kn)
* Range: 420 mi (680 km, 360 nmi)
* Service ceiling: 42,300 ft (12,900 m)
* Rate of climb: 7,700 ft/min (39 m/s)
Specifications
Spotlights
- Trainzo 17 days ago
- Sgtk 17 days ago
- greasytortle 17 days ago
- cyon 18 days ago
- dabestsock 17 days ago
- Christiant2 18 days ago
General Characteristics
- Created On Mac
- Wingspan 24.9ft (7.6m)
- Length 23.5ft (7.2m)
- Height 9.8ft (3.0m)
- Empty Weight 5,277lbs (2,394kg)
- Loaded Weight 6,107lbs (2,770kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 3.532
- Wing Loading 48.0lbs/ft2 (234.5kg/m2)
- Wing Area 127.1ft2 (11.8m2)
- Drag Points 3035
Parts
- Number of Parts 243
- Control Surfaces 5
- Performance Cost 1,029
Love jt
@dekanii yeah that’s weird. I don’t know what happened there.
@CirrusX yea.
I love all X Jets
Very nice build .
@CirrusX Well i have something to say though, why is it not centered in the blueprint view
Those intakes look beautiful!!! Nice Job!
@Christiant2 I agree. In order to innovate, engineers have to learn what works and what doesn’t work aerodynamically. That’s the whole reason why the X-4 IS important.
@CirrusX Thanks for remembering this! Its such an underated jet!
@dekanii thanks!! I had a hard time blending the engine intakes to the wings and body. I stagnated a bunch on this one. Glad it’s finally.
Amazing, you nailed the fuselage shape very well!