Peterbilt 379 Wrecker
28.0k FasterThanLight
4.1 years ago
A wrecker based on an extended chassis Peterbilt 379. It features a fully functional boom, towing fork, outriggers, and an LED light bar. Perfect for lugging heavy vehicles.
CONTROLS:
Pitch to drive.
Roll to steer.
Landing gear lowers outriggers.
Act 1 - Left turn signal.
Act 2 - Right turn signal.
Act 3 - Reverse lights.
Act 4 - Activate boom and LED flasher.
Once boom is acivated, use VTOL to raise and lower boom and TRIM to extend and retract boom.
Act 5 - Activate magnet.
Act 6 - Extend towing fork.
Act 8 - Toggle lights.
Sorry for the hiatus. I hope you all enjoy!
Specifications
Spotlights
- Feanor 4.1 years ago
- MrSilverWolf 4.1 years ago
- 324 4.1 years ago
General Characteristics
- Successors 1 airplane(s)
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 8.4ft (2.6m)
- Length 34.4ft (10.5m)
- Height 11.1ft (3.4m)
- Empty Weight 37,461lbs (16,992kg)
- Loaded Weight 37,461lbs (16,992kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.799
- Wing Loading N/A
- Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
- Drag Points 8674
Parts
- Number of Parts 726
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 3,068
Is there a rotator version?
The ix wrecker is this
@FasterThanLight those trucks sure do have their own personality it feels like lol, and yeah for on roads you would need the class b license, but I would assume that wouldn’t be to tricky to get
(I actually didn’t need one for these trucks as I’m just on the mill property rather than on the main road)
@MrSilverWolf Those old trucks have lots of character. I'd love to get an old Pete 359 and use as a camper, but I have to get my class B license first.
@FasterThanLight yeah I was rather sad when it broke as I really liked it, and they put me in a 1976 Kenworth W900 (it’s the truck in my profile picture actually) after that, but now I’m not driving it again this year as you could probably tell it’s a water truck, which don’t work in winter very well lol
(The water trucks I’m driving are used to keep the dust down at a lumber mill, and they are so hilariously bad that they are great)
@MrSilverWolf That's a real shame. What rig are you driving now?
@FasterThanLight from my understanding it ended up running out of oil way faster than it should have, then it made helicopter sounds with so much smoke where I couldn’t see the rear wheels anymore lol The helicopter sounds were the cylinders hitting the casing and basically breaking apart internally from it and I was told that it wasn’t actually my fault and it was just time for that engine to go, it was all ready in poor shape, it was running on 4 if the 6 cylinders and would go through over a gallon of oil a day
(this was it if you were wondering)
@MrSilverWolf Cool! What ended up being the mechanical failure?
Why would I not updoot this? @FasterThanLight
@FasterThanLight that could be pretty cool, I rather like the MB, I actually drove one for about a week before the engine kinda destroyed itself internally lol
@MrSilverWolf That would be cool but I'm working on a Dodge Bighorn that I'd like to complete first. The MB looks sweet though. Maybe I could build an MB fire truck.
@FasterThanLight no problem! May I suggest a Mack MB for a future build?
Thank you! @KenworthK100TriAxle @CillitBangGang
Thank you! @Doughnut45
Thank you! @Feanor
I will! @SavageMan
Thanks you! @MrSilverWolf
Np, welcome back! I've built a kenworth recently btw you should check that out
Ah a 379, great choice of truck my dude
Thank you! @DEN12345 @SavageMan
Thank you very much! @GenrichTitov
Thank you very much! @SmallyRocket