Ended, please don’t knock our door for entry
Let’s imagine Andrew remove fuselage blocks for some unkown reasons. And we have to live with those classic blocks again.
Rules to follow:
•Do not use fuselage, fuselage cone and fuselage inlet (duh)
•Keep it less than 900 parts, don’t burn mah potato ipad
•It can be anything, a worm, a duck, pixel art, just anything, as long as it doesn’t have fuselage block.
•Deadline is at 26 December.
•It does not need to be successor, I will keep all entries at a forum post. But please tag me when not upload as successor.
Creation will be judged based on:
Functionality- Does it have any function? How well does this function (rip english) 10 points
Aesthetics- Does it looks sexy? Is it hot? 10 points
Details- 10 points
Total 30 points
Reward:
First position- 4 cookies + spotlight (1 cookie)
Second position- 3 cookies
Third position- 2 cookies
All entries- A cookie
Note: Cookie = upvote
Credit to @z24zorpx4 for the onions
Specifications
Spotlights
- Rugpeersdude 7.3 years ago
- FlyingThings 7.3 years ago
- Sauce 7.2 years ago
- realSavageMan 7.3 years ago
General Characteristics
- Predecessor 0-3 Sad Onions
- Successors 24 airplane(s) +1722 bonus
- Created On iOS
- Wingspan 16.4ft (5.0m)
- Length 4.3ft (1.3m)
- Height 16.4ft (5.0m)
- Empty Weight 1,400lbs (635kg)
- Loaded Weight 1,400lbs (635kg)
Performance
- Wing Loading 439,839.3lbs/ft2 (2,147,483.6kg/m2)
- Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
- Drag Points 24752
Parts
- Number of Parts 30
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 74
Sorry, I don’t have enough time.
good luck, do it quick because the challenge is ending very soon. @Viralgardengnome
I’ll try!
@destroyerP Please
Sure @Ryn176
Can you judge mine? I already tagged you
@destroyerP lol
Ask cookie wormster...
I mean cookie monster. @DemonSniper8
Aww now I want a real cookie... lol
Good luck @Thefalloutplayr
lmao @BaconAircraft
Lol you don’t say! @Dynamicneedle
rip @stig27
@destroyerP V’put!
Don’t call something that can handle 900 parts a potato, my tablet can only handle bout 100
@destroyerP oh
Its funny how the challenge its meant to not use fuselages and you used fuselages to make the challenge logo @destroyerP
0 sad onion.
@destroyerP click
yep @JonTKocz
Is XML modding allowed?
I don’t normally think your comments are sarcastic. @Sauce
@destroyerP readers may think that it was sarcastic but it's not XD
still i enjoy making low part noobish planes more than high part replicas
gud @Sauce
finally
a challenge suited for me
lol @ForeverPie