@LjSpike True. But virtually all taildragger planes today are either piston-engine types or turboprops, which is basically a small jet engine that runs a propeller.

@Pilotmario only two fighters, however... There's a few taildragger jet aircraft of larger sizes, as they have the jet engines on the wings, far further forward then a fighter...Additionally taildragging can be useful in taking off at a shorter distance, as your already facing slightly upward.

These planes never caught on for good reason. @Pilotmario

Yeah. The main issue with taildragger jets was that the exhaust will likely interfere with elevator function on the ground, damage the runway, and be at significant risk of damage on takeoff and landing. That's why there were only two operational jet aircraft with this type of gear: the Yak-15 (which was basically a Yak-3 with a clone of a BMW 003 turbojet) and the Hawker Attacker. @PINK

It functions, this thing was a cheap little bird. @Pilotmario

I find the use of taildragger gear on a jet rather curious.

Okay @RhysBrown

I can help with that. @PINK

Okay, will try.....most props are 50x doe. @Tully2001

Can you XML? I need a 5x T1000. @Tully2001

Meh, it works. @Tully2001

I didn't realize your modern Sup used similar gear. @Tully2001

Thanks@Tully2001

Thanks...it was need for the type of plane. @ccooper

Thanks, that is what I strive for. @ccooper