Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II v 2.0
1,623 LockheedMartinAerospace
7.7 years ago
No Tags
Auto Credit Based on LockheedMartinAerospace's Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II
Re-did the scaling error
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor Lockheed Martin F-35A Lightning II
- Successors 2 airplane(s)
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 35.0ft (10.7m)
- Length 50.5ft (15.4m)
- Height 14.2ft (4.3m)
- Empty Weight 29,098lbs (13,198kg)
- Loaded Weight 49,539lbs (22,470kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 0.68
- Wing Loading 30.1lbs/ft2 (146.7kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,648.2ft2 (153.1m2)
- Drag Points 4211
Parts
- Number of Parts 50
- Control Surfaces 4
- Performance Cost 379
@LockheedMartinAerospace Actualy your wrong about the point of the F-35. the point of the aircraft is to be a Jack-of-all-trades plane. it does everything OK not good but OK.
Its assigning an SR-71 to be a dogfighter or a heavy bomber or a ground attacker. But in reality its a stealth jet for recon. The only good thing the F-35 can do is ground attack.
@KabyLakeE I also do my research; the previous comment was my opinion.
@LockheedMartinAerospace It suffers to do that. Do you research?
@KabyLakeE The point of the F-35 is to hide and engage FROM LONG-RANGE, not much into dogfighting maneuverability. That is why it is not a Mach 2 fighter; it has to be slow to spend more time far away.
@LockheedMartinAerospace No the real one.
@KabyLakeE Check again: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/9W2167/Lockheed-Martin-F-35A-Lightning-II
@LockheedMartinAerospace Also the real f35 is really bad.
@LockheedMartinAerospace Usually a replica is made with way more than 50 parts. I've made some primitive replicas and 75% of them are over 100 parts. Some even 300 parts. But calling this a replica would be like calling sand a replica of the human body. Just saying...
This is not even close to a replica.
@KDS Thanks
Congrats on silver!
@LockheedMartinAerospace Nice. I had a plane like this posted, but looking back, I realize that it was actually a Raptor (Currently deleted for lack of upvotes/downloads/comments).
This is so cool!
@t8erh8er https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/7cdsCq/YF-23
@t8erh8er Check some of my other ones, then.
@t8erh8er ikr.
@t8erh8er Anyways, would be much harder is KSP
and the wing area isn't right.....
yeah lol @t8erh8er
@t8erh8er What I meant was the scaling was off, not the entire design.
@MechWARRIOR57 Try adding 1 single pound. And on my info tab in SP, it says 49,540 lbs.
but your loaded weight isn't right.... xD