1900-1930's Challenge-Trinity fighter
27.9k SteadfastContracting
8.7 years ago
Auto Credit Based on SteadfastContracting's 1900-1935 Challenge-Trinity fighter
A bit faster and more agile than the last.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor 1900-1935 Challenge-Trinity fighter
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 34.2ft (10.4m)
- Length 29.2ft (8.9m)
- Height 12.6ft (3.8m)
- Empty Weight 2,755lbs (1,250kg)
- Loaded Weight 5,646lbs (2,561kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.177
- Wing Loading 8.2lbs/ft2 (40.1kg/m2)
- Wing Area 687.2ft2 (63.8m2)
- Drag Points 3258
Parts
- Number of Parts 92
- Control Surfaces 27
- Performance Cost 435
@Hadesrocks No problem man. Thanks for all the awesome creations and helpful tips and tricks you have given.
Thank you fr all your support @SteadfastContracting
@AviownCorp Yeah... Well tell @hadesrocks
@Hadesrocks Platinum!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@SteadfastContracting hm it really has smaller turning radius! Lots of control surfaces
Np @SteadfastContracting
Thanks @Hadesrocks
Thanks @VernalTie513
@AviownCorp A few of @Hadesrocks plane scan do this. Here is a link to his posts: Hadesrocks.
@AviownCorp Here's one Use it at around 25% for desired effect.
@SteadfastContracting can you give me the link please so I can try them too?
@AviownCorp Fewer than dozens at this speed, but I have seen it.
@SteadfastContracting at this speed? My last jet has 950 feet at Mach 1
Thanks @Misha1004
@AviownCorp Thanks, but it's not impossible for a jet plane to have a small turn radius. I've downloaded dozens of planes that have a smaller turn radius than this.
@SteadfastContracting I have tried it. You won because of it's very small turning radius which is normal for a propeller driven plane and impossible for a jet plane!!! Yet this one flies very good!!
@AviownCorp Try this against your newest plane but take off the missiles so its more fair. Sometimes it dies but other times it will surprise you and actually win.
@AviownCorp Lol. Thanks!
First!!