Profile image

1900-1930's Challenge-Trinity fighter

27.9k SteadfastContracting  8.7 years ago
Auto Credit Based on SteadfastContracting's 1900-1935 Challenge-Trinity fighter

A bit faster and more agile than the last.

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor 1900-1935 Challenge-Trinity fighter
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 34.2ft (10.4m)
  • Length 29.2ft (8.9m)
  • Height 12.6ft (3.8m)
  • Empty Weight 2,755lbs (1,250kg)
  • Loaded Weight 5,646lbs (2,561kg)

Performance

  • Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.177
  • Wing Loading 8.2lbs/ft2 (40.1kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 687.2ft2 (63.8m2)
  • Drag Points 3258

Parts

  • Number of Parts 92
  • Control Surfaces 27
  • Performance Cost 435
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image

    @Hadesrocks No problem man. Thanks for all the awesome creations and helpful tips and tricks you have given.

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    Thank you fr all your support @SteadfastContracting

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AviownCorp Yeah... Well tell @hadesrocks

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @Hadesrocks Platinum!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    56.2k AviownCorp

    @SteadfastContracting hm it really has smaller turning radius! Lots of control surfaces

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    Np @SteadfastContracting

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    Thanks @Hadesrocks

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    Thanks @VernalTie513

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AviownCorp A few of @Hadesrocks plane scan do this. Here is a link to his posts: Hadesrocks.

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AviownCorp Here's one Use it at around 25% for desired effect.

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    56.2k AviownCorp

    @SteadfastContracting can you give me the link please so I can try them too?

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AviownCorp Fewer than dozens at this speed, but I have seen it.

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    56.2k AviownCorp

    @SteadfastContracting at this speed? My last jet has 950 feet at Mach 1

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    Thanks @Misha1004

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AviownCorp Thanks, but it's not impossible for a jet plane to have a small turn radius. I've downloaded dozens of planes that have a smaller turn radius than this.

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    56.2k AviownCorp

    @SteadfastContracting I have tried it. You won because of it's very small turning radius which is normal for a propeller driven plane and impossible for a jet plane!!! Yet this one flies very good!!

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AviownCorp Try this against your newest plane but take off the missiles so its more fair. Sometimes it dies but other times it will surprise you and actually win.

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image

    @AviownCorp Lol. Thanks!

    8.7 years ago
  • Profile image
    56.2k AviownCorp

    First!!

    8.7 years ago