Specs: Must have 10 parts or less. Must be an aircraft. Must be able to take off/ land and fly (Duh!). must have a clear description with ALL THE CONTROLS! Max is 10 parts. 2 weeks -that's the 28th of September!(You don't need that long do you?)
Judging will be out of 10 for each part of the criteria and will be added up.
I will be judging all but:
Auto UAV by Rub3n213
ASDFASDF1'S '10 PART CHALLENGE'
Racing jet by CDRxavier
The results are in!
Here is the top 5;
5: The1big1finger1111-17/20
4: Rub3n213's Dapper Dart Lite-18/20
3: LusK-18/20
2: Type2Volkswagen-19/20
1: AN2felllla-20/20
Specifications
Spotlights
- Kerbango 6.3 years ago
- DerMetzgermeister 6.3 years ago
- Chancey21 6.3 years ago
- Spacedoge12345plane 6.3 years ago
- ACEPILOT109 6.3 years ago
General Characteristics
- Successors 29 airplane(s) +497 bonus
- Created On Mac
- Wingspan 32.8ft (10.0m)
- Length 7.0ft (2.1m)
- Height 16.7ft (5.1m)
- Empty Weight 2,577lbs (1,169kg)
- Loaded Weight 2,577lbs (1,169kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.193
- Wing Loading 159.6lbs/ft2 (779.4kg/m2)
- Wing Area 16.1ft2 (1.5m2)
- Drag Points 51172
Parts
- Number of Parts 29
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 167
@Trijets also, quite a lot didn't make it because of 'defects'.
@Trijets When I was testing, I created scores for all of the planes. But I only placed the top 5. Sorry, I can't remember where your's came.
@FuzzyAircraftProductions did you calculate my place or only the top 5? Was my plane good?
... @FuzzyAircraftProductions
@jamesPLANESii Screw it!
Yes but I won with a bad plane. @FuzzyAircraftProductions
@jamesPLANESii Yeah but I did the judging. NOT YOU
I’d put it like this:
5th LusK
Looks cool, and landing would be pretty good... if the control surfaces weren’t so small. They make it difficult to fly. But still, pretty good!
4th: Liamwellman123
Flies well, looks good, but is virtually impossible to land, and it could take off easier.
3rd: Spectre2520
Looks good, flies very well, lands well, but is very difficult to take off.
2nd: Rub3n123
Flies well, easy to take off and land, it’d be nice if the colour is better though, but it’s still pretty good looking!
1st: Type2volkswagen
Flies really well, is easy to take off and land, looks really good, high detail for 10 parts!
I’ll see you in court! @FuzzyAircraftProductions
@Rub3n213 No you wouldn't have! That didn't count as take off and landing!
SO THERE.GG everyone! Lucky my UAV was disqualified i would of won..
Oh and probably make a forum post about the results.
Flynn why did I win I’d say my plane was one of the worst
@Chancey21 Here ya go.
Results?
@Trijets yeh
Okay i better see results on october 12
I thought we had to the 28th to submit.
@atgxtg hmmm
You could always make it a requirement to be able to successfully land on a carrier, that would up the ante. Maybe even be able to take off from one too.
@Stingray Good point!
No need to respond, just a comment: with far less than 10 parts, no landing gear, it’s easy to build a flyable aircraft model. In the future maybe you could define what “landing” means since some entrants to this challenge offer landing=crash. Something for you to chew on, in your future postings.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/MHLdur/9-Part-Flying-WIng
Here is my entry!
Well, this is intresting. Definitely gonna try it out!
@RJ12102005 ok!