NS Herrnstadt III
Originally designed to be around 510 meters long, the Herrnstadt III had to be shortened due to some technical issues involving the size of the ship. Fortunately, its a lot easier to handle now.
Trim slider: Control rudder. Up=turn to starboard. Down=turn to port
VTOL slider: Controls propeller pitch. Up=forward Down=reverse. Works best when the VTOL slider is around 1/3 up/down
Sail at 15% thrust when not turning. Increase thrust when turning to maintain speed.
Herrnstadt III, Bulk carrier laid down 1975
Displacement:
654,810 t light; 668,174 t standard; 668,174 t normal; 668,174 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
1,279.53 ft / 1,279.53 ft x 262.47 ft x 82.02 ft (normal load)
390.00 m / 390.00 m x 80.00 m x 25.00 m
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 16.0" / 406 mm 959.65 ft / 292.50 m 19.44 ft / 5.93 m
Ends: 14.0" / 356 mm 319.86 ft / 97.49 m 19.44 ft / 5.93 m
Upper: 10.0" / 254 mm 959.65 ft / 292.50 m 8.00 ft / 2.44 m
Main Belt covers 115 % of normal length
- Torpedo Bulkhead:
12.0" / 305 mm 959.65 ft / 292.50 m 81.36 ft / 24.80 m
- Armour deck: 6.00" / 152 mm, Conning tower: 20.00" / 508 mm
Machinery:
Nuclear reactor, steam turbines,
Electric motors, 4 shafts, 1,000,000 shp / 746,000 Kw = 31.59 kts
Range unlimited at 0.00 kts
Complement:
20-60
Cost:
£205.365 million / $821.461 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Armour: 91,699 tons, 13.7 %
- Belts: 19,822 tons, 3.0 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 34,666 tons, 5.2 %
- Armament: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Armour Deck: 33,917 tons, 5.1 %
- Conning Tower: 3,293 tons, 0.5 %
Machinery: 23,923 tons, 3.6 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 539,188 tons, 80.7 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 13,363 tons, 2.0 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
4,606,107 lbs / 2,089,295 Kg = 42,649.1 x 6 " / 152 mm shells or 8,160.9 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.48
Metacentric height 41.7 ft / 12.7 m
Roll period: 17.1 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 58 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.00
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.17
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has raised forecastle
Block coefficient: 0.849
Length to Beam Ratio: 4.88 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 35.77 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 56 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 0.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 50.85 ft / 15.50 m
- Forecastle (10 %): 50.85 ft / 15.50 m (41.01 ft / 12.50 m aft of break)
- Mid (50 %): 41.01 ft / 12.50 m
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 41.01 ft / 12.50 m
- Stern: 41.01 ft / 12.50 m
- Average freeboard: 41.99 ft / 12.80 m
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 14.7 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 204.3 %
Waterplane Area: 305,559 Square feet or 28,387 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 479 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 1,378 lbs/sq ft or 6,727 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 4.51
- Longitudinal: 6.35
- Overall: 4.67
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 286.6ft (87.4m)
- Length 1284.1ft (391.4m)
- Height 246.9ft (75.3m)
- Empty Weight N/A
- Loaded Weight N/A
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.067
- Wing Loading 9.3lbs/ft2 (45.3kg/m2)
- Wing Area 1,600,667.4ft2 (148,707.0m2)
- Drag Points 2974693
Parts
- Number of Parts 400
- Control Surfaces 32
- Performance Cost 1,656
np
@Stellarlabs Of course, i don't mind.
@Feanor Can see that happening.... especially in the union. Mind if I take her for a run?
Sterne-Labor is going more Naval.
@Stellarlabs It does depend.
1: It could be a tramp steamer, though it won't be very economical to run
2: Hauling iron ore from South America or Australia to Europe or China though its nuclear reactors might be problematic.
3: It could be laid up for a few decades before being scrapped because its too expensive to run.
What is her purpose? Don't know soviet stuff well.
Cool!
@randomusername @kgv23 @Carsong1017 Thanks!