Your plane became even more challenging to play when I scales it up to real life size.

@HololiveFan ik this is very late but the c5 isn’t retired. They use the aircraft quite a bit.

Has a very fatal stopping issue.

A tip that speaks to KLM’s point concerning the RL gross weight of the aircraft, SP includes the area of the vertical and horizontal stabilizers, so your number in the designer will not reflect the true “wing area”, as understood in real life. The workaround is to look up the RL wing area (Wiki lists the C-5 wing area as 6,200 sq ft), add the wings and size them to 6,200 sq ft. Once that’s sorted, then add the vertical and horizontal stabs; this way your build will more closely reflect the RL lifting capability. As for the jittery landing gear, yes, SP is very annoying, there are workarounds, but tweaking masses and lowering forward reaction does minimize these issues.

@DJRianGamer004 where did you get that idea? We have 56 C-5Ms currently in the inventory, upgraded with new engines (GE F138 / CF6, same as the 747) and avionics.

This is really good, the flight model is excellent. It is certainly underweight and overpowered, but it feels like flying a big jet. The build is complete without being needlessly complex.

@MARKY3090 and its ptfs yall

lets all play pilot training flight simulator on roblox.

@McDonnellDouglas no need to be so mean jees :/

@McDonnellDouglas :(

@DJRianGamer004 no one cares abt your roblox account

@Chillybaconface Fact: all the C-5 planes are retiered

Cool I like it

You know the rules, and so do I.
Time to shoot it down and make cool epic crash

@Chillybaconface friend me in roblox my account username is DJRianGamer and my display name is Rian

@Chillybaconface ok

@DJRianGamer004 not but ill try to make it mobile capable

Is it okay when i use low physics?

@Chillybaconface Okay, well good job overall.

@klm747klm747 i just made the plane decent enough to fly nicely thats the reason why i dont put alot of weight, i tried my best to keep the landing from shaking or exploding because of the additional rotator & spring by attaching the top part of the landing gear into a separate hinge & connect the spring directly into its hinge & yes i agree that the brakes are weak i just noticed it when i fly it more & more

Good to see you included the TF-39s.

Whoa this thing needs a lot of work, it feels like it has no brakes, 0.6 is not enough brake torque for a 230,000 pound airplane, even with this amount of wheels. Performance specifications say the airplane should be able to land and stop in 4,900 feet at 840,000 pounds

I loaded it up to its true maximum takeoff weight and the airplane could not fly, as well as the landing gear being super buggy.

@Mikey101234 its just the wing scale which affects the COL

How does this get on front page when the wings don’t have ailerons. I can’t tell you. Hint: look at the COL

I’ve been waiting for a C-5B like this! This is great! I’m gonna rig up my light modules for it that I’ve gathered and coded. Loving it already

Very nice Galaxy . Great build .