Profile image

X-47B Block XIII Prototype

9,696 RX9115S  2.0 years ago
Auto Credit Based on Zaineman's Zaine's 15 Part Mach 1 Challenge CLOSED

Guess That SimplePlane!!!

IT'S AN X-47B!!! YEY!!

15 Part Mach 1 Challenge Entry Aircraft

ABOUT THIS PLANE:

After I gave up trying to make a proof of concept of an original aircraft design due to XML Modding limitations, I decided to build a much more simple designed aircraft, hence, the X-47B. The X-47B Block XIII got its name from how many parts it uses which is 13 parts, and like my previous build, I will build a production version of this aircraft.

AIRCRAFT DESCRIPTION:

X-47B Block XIII Prototype is an initial presentation of the X-47B Block XIII which is a carrier-based flying wing stealth drone project designed to be undetected and untouchable in enemy airspace and able to perform at supersonic speeds while being the most agile of any UAV that came before it.

Controls:
  • Normal Aircraft Controls

ENJOY AND HAVE FUN!

General Characteristics

  • Predecessor Zaine's 15 Part Mach 1 Challenge CLOSED
  • Created On Windows
  • Wingspan 22.7ft (6.9m)
  • Length 14.2ft (4.3m)
  • Height 2.4ft (0.7m)
  • Empty Weight 4,133lbs (1,874kg)
  • Loaded Weight 4,880lbs (2,213kg)

Performance

  • Power/Weight Ratio 2.302
  • Wing Loading 49.9lbs/ft2 (243.4kg/m2)
  • Wing Area 97.9ft2 (9.1m2)
  • Drag Points 248

Parts

  • Number of Parts 13
  • Control Surfaces 4
  • Performance Cost 57
  • Log in to leave a comment
  • Profile image
    9,696 RX9115S

    Upvotes and Comments are Very Appreciated! Thank You Very Much!

    Pinned 2.0 years ago
  • Profile image
    191k Zaineman

    Fantastic aircraft RX9115S ! Looks 10/10 Speed 10/10 Turning 9/10 . I take all the aircraft into the canyons at Wright Airport for testing their turning capabilities. Yours made it through almost the entire canyon until I hit the hairpin turn to the right. It could not turn tight enough and hit the wall and exploded. Lol. Thus the 9/10 . I will be speaking with you in a private post in a moment to discuss this.

    +1 2.0 years ago