SU-101-URALMASH
3,942 MarteenLockkenn
18 days ago
SU-101-URALMASH
It is an experimental tank destroyer planned to replace the SU-100. Two prototypes were built and underwent trials in April–May 1945. Its reasonable technical qualities were not sufficient for the project to be successful, and after the end of the war it was discontinued as it was unnecessary to start producing a new vehicle based on the vehicles used in the war.
PITCH: FORWARD-BACKWARD
YAW:LEFT-RIGHT
TRIM:BARREL-LIFT
AG-1:LIGHTS
Specifications
Spotlights
- Sakorsky 17 days ago
- WritersCrusadersAirCo2 17 days ago
General Characteristics
- Created On Android
- Wingspan 16.8ft (5.1m)
- Length 34.8ft (10.6m)
- Height 13.8ft (4.2m)
- Empty Weight 14,769lbs (6,699kg)
- Loaded Weight 26,546lbs (12,041kg)
Performance
- Wing Loading N/A
- Wing Area 0.0ft2 (0.0m2)
- Drag Points 10840
Parts
- Number of Parts 278
- Control Surfaces 0
- Performance Cost 1,698
I think the casemate is a little too high in my opinion, the tank being too wide and the mantlet not being accurate,but good tank still
@MarteenLockkenn @Sakorsky good, now kiss :3
It's not bad, of course, but it's not exactly good either....... I would say a little bit of everything
@MarteenLockkenn yes, sorry if my response bothered you, I tried to be firm since I've always let others step on me, I'm glad to see you build something for yourself, keep doing better. You may use parts of my builds with proper credit.
Let's get this over with 🤝
@Sakorsky Look brother, I build all of my buildings from scratch. If I used or modified someone's structure, I would have said so. I never take anyone's credit, I am not a labor thief.
You may remember the Stug E-100 Overwhelming Build I built, it wasn't a copy and paste, I built it from scratch too, I just used your techniques, but I was a bit in a hurry and forgot to give you credit, and even when I answered you honestly, your response was very insulting.
That's why I got angry and removed your credit. Your friend directly blamed me without knowing anything.
Anyway, it's over now, I don't care about people who say that anymore.
Are We Still Friends?🤝
Sorry about my friend, did you really built it from scratch? Just asking, let's be civil. I do not accuse you.
not sided with him though, just dont bring any drama further
@MarteenLockkenn chill out, just block him its that easy
@Aeralis Now I understand, you are Sakorsky's friend, that's why you wrote such things, I understand that you are not even worth my reply anymore.
@Aeralis Keep fawning over what others do, you kid.
@Aeralis You don't know what to do anymore and you start lying.
@Aeralis Construction I did it myself from beginning to end, I did not take even a small thing from anyone. Even if I did, I would give credit.
@Aeralis the fact that the gun mantlet is way too small compared to the original one is what makes it ugly?
@Aeralis what I really dont like is the childish behavior here, hes been given a warning by the original poster to atleast give credit when using his stuff and his reason not to the next time he got caught is "because the message was not respectful."
@cyon just look at it, the place to mount the gun is heightened when in the original it was fine, maybe had he made the tank himself it would've been good.
@Aeralis yes its true, its not his build but why is it ugly?
@NavalGunnery tell me about it.
Man that is cringe
@cyon this is not his build.
??
wdym
And truly shameless.
Ugly.