No Tags
Auto Credit Based on AnOlympicWalnut's Yak-9T
Original by @AnOlympicWalnut, it's rudder is weird at high speed turns(anything above 150 usually) also, this is using the 37mm cannon not the 12.7mm that has also been used on the Yak, the gun's specs are that of the 37mm.
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Predecessor Yak-9T
- Created On Windows
- Wingspan 32.7ft (10.0m)
- Length 29.1ft (8.9m)
- Height 11.3ft (3.4m)
- Empty Weight 4,683lbs (2,124kg)
- Loaded Weight 6,814lbs (3,090kg)
Performance
- Horse Power/Weight Ratio 0.177
- Wing Loading 12.1lbs/ft2 (59.2kg/m2)
- Wing Area 562.1ft2 (52.2m2)
- Drag Points 1668
Parts
- Number of Parts 94
- Control Surfaces 14
- Performance Cost 426
@Colonel1J2R3Wolf yeah
@FGW2014 Should we stick with the ORIGINAL name, of the VERY first AiroWolf, ever.?
@Colonel1J2R3Wolf idk, i just thought of something that would fit war, i mean, idk
@FGW2014 Okay, I guess that's as good a name as any....?
@Colonel1J2R3Wolf Dirty Dancer
@FGW2014 That's the name of the Wolfie bomber, the AiroWolf Mk.I-A maybe the name, "Danger Dog" or something, maybe you can come up with a name.?
@Colonel1J2R3Wolf that is a good name
@FGW2014 I am currently in a place without my building PC, so when I get back I will work on it, and maybe suggest a name to use for it. like the Wolfie Mk.I-A "Lucky Lady".
@Colonel1J2R3Wolf that would be splended, can't wait to see it
@FGW2014 Thanks, sorry for the looks I have been away for quite sometime, so when I get back later, I'll make the full interior cockpit function AiroWolf Mk.I-A
@Colonel1J2R3Wolf it flies very well, the only problem i can see is scaling, your vertical stabilizer is way too big in contrast to the cockpit, and the body is the wrong shape, other than that is a pretty accurate representation, nice job!
@AnOlympicWalnut Thanks, had some time and came back but I can only stay for a few minutes it's 22:15.
Not bad @Colonel1J2R3Wolf!
@FGW2014 Sorry took me so long to get back, what do you think of it? and what bugs do you see in it, I will try to work them out at a later date. I have to go again, but I'll be back tomorrow to check.
@Colonel1J2R3Wolf no problem
Thanks @FGW2014
@AnOlympicWalnut here it is. :) I hope you like it.