No Tags
!!!No mods were harmed in the making of this plane!!!
Activator 1 for the rear gears, normal gear controls for the front gear. Activator 1 is controlled by throttle. This lands best at 25% and 120 mph, and I dropped it onto the USS Jundroo cleanly on the first attempt.
This is what I have conceptualised what a WWII Nazi Germany fighter plane might have been like if the war didn't end when it did. They already experimented with forward sweeping wings. After the first prototype were built with powerful propellor engines, it's likely that Hilter would have ordered these be made as rocket powered instead for even more deadliness before full production commenced. This is a very agile plane for it's time, and packed with six machine guns and target finder to make shooting down allied fighters even more easier. Feel free to add bombs if you like. Enjoy!
Specifications
General Characteristics
- Created On Mac
- Wingspan 35.8ft (10.9m)
- Length 27.8ft (8.5m)
- Height 9.7ft (3.0m)
- Empty Weight 6,624lbs (3,005kg)
- Loaded Weight 8,501lbs (3,856kg)
Performance
- Power/Weight Ratio 1.321
- Wing Loading 24.3lbs/ft2 (118.8kg/m2)
- Wing Area 349.3ft2 (32.5m2)
- Drag Points 3193
Parts
- Number of Parts 153
- Control Surfaces 5
- Performance Cost 399
Comments
- Log in to leave a comment
-
57.1k bjac0@Authros ok.9.4 years ago
-
72.5k Authros@bjac0 I shall consider it but right now I'm having a little break. Having difficultly getting in the mood to build at the moment but still enjoying everyone else's work.9.4 years ago
-
57.1k bjac0@Authros Remember when you rated my Kyushu J7W1? Maybe you should try to make it in simple planes like i did!9.4 years ago
-
3,690 LjSpike@Authros Could you make me a fusilage maybe, about 10-12 meters long, With space on the bottom to attach a front retractable landing gear and 2 back retractable landing gears...9.4 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOldI think I got one kinda working also check out the cool Autogyro I made @Authros9.4 years ago
-
9,624 HypnoticChicken@Authros I made it again, but it doesn't work now because of the update9.4 years ago
-
72.5k Authros@PlanesOfOld I can make a real working prop but they are limited by size as they can only spin at a certain speed and simply can't create the right amount of air movement to get enough speed or in the instance of a helicopter, lift. I'll just wait for the new props in the updatem9.4 years ago
-
9,624 HypnoticChicken@Authros mine didn't drive around on the bottom.9.4 years ago
-
72.5k Authros@Hypnoticchicken I recall a sub of that description. It used VTOL engines which were left on ground so the sub could basically drive about on the land below the surface of the water.9.4 years ago
-
77.9k Cedy117Sounds awesome @Hypnoticchicken9.4 years ago
-
9,624 HypnoticChicken@Cedy117 before we had floating blocks, I made a submarine that actually went in the water, I never uploaded it though.9.4 years ago
-
77.9k Cedy117Yeah I seen them lol @Authros9.4 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOldAlso is it possible to make a rotary engine with all the cylinders at different angles?9.4 years ago
-
43.9k PlanesOfOldBtw can you create a plane using a propellor that I am creating that uses the actual prop to drive the plane instead of a pusher or puller engine it has VTOLs on the shaft and has variable pitch at the moment9.4 years ago
-
15.9k AllstarAwesome9.4 years ago
-
452 FoxChaosFlies quite well9.4 years ago
-
3,690 LjSpike@Authros try to WunderWaffe (UFO pretty much) it's a VTOL the Nazis worked on. Lots of variations were testing, some running off nuclear power of some form.9.4 years ago
-
Mod TheLatentImageNice build man, I like this.9.4 years ago
-
32.7k WakescarScary...9.4 years ago
-
72.5k Authros@Cedy117 There are rotators on this but I could have built it without them easily enough.9.4 years ago
-
25.2k JacobHardy64Right @Authros9.4 years ago
-
77.9k Cedy117Cool I was thinking of doing a classic build challenge no resizing nose cones no air brakes no rotators basically what we would build before the big update this is a good example9.4 years ago
-
72.5k Authros@JacobHardy64 No it's not a real plane, but the technology was being invented at the time so I'm sure it could have existed had the war lasted a couple more years, so let's be glad it ended when it did.9.4 years ago
-
25.2k JacobHardy64Very interesting. Was this an actual concept or no?9.4 years ago
-
3,141 NightraiderCool9.4 years ago
- Log in to see more comments
